User talk:PierreLarcin~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --bainer (talk) 09:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * Hi, you posted a "disputed neutrality" warning to the article Rotary International refering to discussions on the talk page. To do so, do you have sufficient knowledge about the organization or do you think it is good enough when someone says his opinion even it might not be true? CeeGee 21:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I have a very extensive knowledge of Rotary. PierreLarcin 10:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And I know the different ways for Rotarian to uplift their public image : defamation of critics and silence on their bad aspects. Like any public relations private company...It's just business, no ?

Replied here. Jpeob 22:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Replied here also. Bye. P.

Replied again. Jpeob 08:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied again. Jpeob 22:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Rotary edit war still beginning
Hi. Regarding your latest posting on my talk page, all what I can say is, it has been explained several times to you before by others. That means, nothing remains to me anymore to say. CeeGee 20:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * OK. So I note that you refuse to explain your edit. Good. You know the purpose of my question. I thank you for the clear answer. PierreLarcin 22:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Mel Gibson
You added a comment about rotary club to Mel Gibson and said that you would explain on the talk page. I did not see an explanation. Your edit is also uncited. You need a source for it. --Blue Tie 11:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * please take the time to read the talk page. I did not said "I would" but I said "It is".

There is also a source, and all is under the title "philanthropy" in Mel Gibson's wiki discussion page. Please take the time to read really the talk page. Best regards. PierreLarcin 19:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Lien vers Enguerran

http://france-intelligente.bbflash.net/Le-Journal-independant-f14/Rotary-club-t292.htm

Liens vers Louis Michel et Rotary

http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:1mpxEpRjwh0J:www.rotary-bruxellesforetdesoignes.be/Faines/fichiers/fain%25E9e%252015.pdf+%22Louis+Michel%22+rotarien&hl=fr&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=fr Rotary Foret de Soignes

Rotarian Presence on wiki
dpariero bie que l'andijaunes va passer un biniou a snami braaille desmilles pour une sake du Rotary min'tnin qu'y nveu nie qu'on sass qui berdouille sur wiki !

Rotary International talk page template
Since Rotary International is headquartered in Evanston, IL I have readded template. Hopefully, other WikiProjects will find this article relevant, but for now we are all you've got. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 18:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration
I inform you that I contacted the users who already met you on the Rotary page and invited them to bring their contribution to the arbitration if need be. Best regards --Bombastus 23:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I is a good idea. Indeed, I think that the point of bringing facts as the tribune given to conservative speakers as Von Braun, Ron Hubbard or conservative (right) politicians is a question of principle. It is not a question of voting, of grouping user for this POV or that POV.
 * Wiki brings facts to the media, to the people, and the hiding of facts to people is not wiki-compliant. Best regards (as I commonly says - stop with your ironic behaviour please) Pierre 07:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Wiki has rules and your "principles" are not the rules of WP. Please stop disrupting WP to illustrate your point. See WP:POINT.--Bombastus 07:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * it is better you say that to the Arbitration Committee.

You may not blank facts that encounter your own POV, Bombastus. As far as I know, the speakers I mentioned in the "Rotarian famous speakers" list, are not criminals, except in YOUR POV.

What is criminal ? The time-consuming aspect of your multiple edit wars. You are not a person who has THE truth on subjects and the NEED to IMPOSE your views to others.

Pierre 07:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I strictly don't care about RI or about what these lecturers did and who they are. I explained my position on the talk page so please read it. The goal of WP isn't to list lecturers or to illustrate your POV. Your lecturers could be far left extremists (which is the same as far right btw), that would be the same for me.--Bombastus 07:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * If you do not care about RI, why did you proceed the SAME edit war on both

fr.wiki for Rotary and en.wiki ? If you have far left extremists to place in the list of speakers, feel free to place that in the list. I placed FAMOUS lecturers or speakers that I found. As far as I know Ron Hubbard is not a political person, Louis Michel is a brillant polician and EEC commissary, and Joseph Davidovits is a brilliant scientist. Guy Haarsher, my personal philosophy professor, is a brilliant left-engaged Jewish person, a real humanist, but he has no wiki, while it would be OK to redact a wiki for him. THE PROBLEM is that your POV edit war are time-consuming, as it was against CeeGee, against all right-activists who do not allow opposite opinions to contribute, that your edit wars I say do not allow to US, COMMON WIKIPEDIA USERS, to bring new wikies to the community. And the sense of my arbitration is to ask a blame for your time-consuming administrative actions

By the way, you argue AFTER your edit war. As usual. As did BridesMill.

Pierre 08:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply
The Arbcom voted, 4 to 2, not to accept the case because, in their opinion, there were other dispute resolution venues that you could try. Here is the link to the case on the revision of the page before it was removed, note the 2/4/0/0 tally. See Dispute resolution for more info. Picaroon (Talk) 00:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Rotary International
I am going to formally request you to leave the Rotary International article and talk page completely alone for at least one month. Your argumentation there is disruptive and is impeding others in their attempts to maintain a neutral article. Guy (Help!) 16:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Bradipus is attacking you
It seems User Bradipus want to have you out of Wikipedia.
 * Talking to yourself? :-o  Bradipus (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

You went OF COURSE to Pinochet to wipe his membership to Rotary in your very recent edits... There is a reason, I guess : you do not allow to see the chief of your political party, Louis Michel in the list with dictator Pinochet. So, Rotary is not your point, you just want to hide facts...for political reasons. I'll restore the list. 84.100.98.90 (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2008

Tony Fox is attacking you
It seems User Bradipus want to have you out of Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=222419578

They removed your name and manipulated archives to mask your data about Rotary International Congrats, hang on. 84.102.229.192 (talk) 07:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
Pierre, old fellow, you are here to further a campaign, and nothing else. I'm sorry, but that is not what Wikipedia is for. It's been going on for a long time, many people have talked to you about it with varying degrees of firmness, but in the end you are not here for the benefit of the encyclopaedia, you are here for the furtherance of your off-wiki agenda. This abortive Arbitration: is a perfect example of the kind of aggressive advocacy you have engaged in. Without making any judgement on the merit of your opinions, which I suspect a decent number of Wikipedians will share to some degree, I am afraid that Wikipedia is not the place for you to continue this. I have blocked you with no expiry date. It is conceivable you may be able to persuade some sympathetic admin that you intend to mend your ways, or may be able to agree to some kind of mentorship or topic restriction, and I will certainly not stand in your way if you can, but I'm afraid I have to agree with those who think it is time to put a stop to your soapboxing here. Guy (Help!) 23:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called PierreLarcin. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name PierreLarcin~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)