User talk:Pierrefilmt

Welcome!
Hi Pierrefilmt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Femke (talk) 14:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I just reviewed the draft article you wrote. Unfortunately, there aren't enough independent sources yet to show the subject is sufficiently notable for an article on Wikipedia. Normally, you'd get a message on your talk page, but the script made a mistake and put the message on the talk page of User talk:Rezusfilm instead. Let me know if you have any more questions. Femke (talk) 14:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netherlands Society of Cinematographers (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Femkemilene was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Netherlands_Society_of_Cinematographers Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Femkemilene&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Netherlands_Society_of_Cinematographers reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Femke (talk) 14:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Femke,

Thanks for your input. Too bad that the article was refused. Will try and find more independent sources for the page. Could it help that there is a Dutch version of the page which had been approved?

What kind of sources could help to get this page published?

Thanks in advance!

Best, Pierre

PS Is het de bedoeling dat we in het Engels communiceren zodat iedereen het hier kan volgen?

Pierrefilmt (talk) 15:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hallo :).
 * To show a subject is notable, the two most important things are:
 * that the source is independent of the subject (het Parool is a good example here) and
 * that there the source contains significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV). Significant coverage means that the source has more than a sentence on the topic (het Parool fails here: it only mentions the subject twice) If it uses about a 100 words on the topic, it's very likely significant. Some people argue as little as 50 words may also be okay. We would like multiple sources (about WP:THREE, depending on the quality) that meet these criteria.
 * Different languages have different criteria for articles. I've had one of my translations from enwiki to nlwiki deleted at some point, and I've seen articles deleted here that do have an article on the Dutch Wikipedia.
 * Ik denk dat het wel netter is om in het Engels te praten. Als je het artikel opnieuw submit, zal er waarschijnlijk iemand anders naar kijken. Femke (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also important to know, if you work for the organisation or have another type of conflict of interest, you should disclose this. For more information, see WP:DISCLOSE. Femke (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Femke,

I have edited the article, hope it will meet the criteria of enough and independent coverage. Will you have a look?

Thanks!

Best, Pierre Pierrefilmt (talk) 23:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I've included some more feedback on how to make life easier for the next reviewer. Femke (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netherlands Society of Cinematographers (July 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Netherlands_Society_of_Cinematographers Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Netherlands_Society_of_Cinematographers reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 08:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers
Hello, Pierrefilmt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Netherlands Society of Cinematographers


Hello, Pierrefilmt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Netherlands Society of Cinematographers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)