User talk:Pierregaubil

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 23:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sensopia
Hello Pierregaubil,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sensopia for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ormr2014 | Talk 19:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I've modified the speedy deletion rationale from G11 (promotional) to A7 (no indication of importance). Also, since the article includes the sentence "Sensopia was founded in May 2010 by Pierre Gaubil [et al]", you should probably also take a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. {&#123; Nihiltres &#124;talk&#124;edits}&#125; 19:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Notability
Please read WP:CORP about notability for companies, and WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove it. I would also advise reading WP:COI about editing subjects you are very close to. If you try again, put it at User:Pierregaubil/DRAFT, and when you think you are getting somewhere, ask for an opinion. Do make sure you have the RS references first - without them there's no chance. Do remember that the vast majority of companies and organisations don't have articles here - this is an encyclopaedia and not a directory, and only the ones that pass our requirements get in. (Some of those - and some of the people with articles - that are in don't want to be. If they are notable for rather bad things, they're likely to be in if things are referenced properly...) Peridon (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)