User talk:Piguy101/Archive 5

Request
Piguy101, I will appreciate if you would add your opinion regarding Flavia C. Gernatt on the deletion nomination by the another editor. The article, Flavia C. Gernatt includes relevant sources that are according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including widely reliable sources such as The Buffalo News, a nationally-recognized newspaper, and the widely-dispersed journal, Pit & Quarry. The article should remain as an individual article, and not merged or deleted. This article meets relevant guidelines and policies to be an independent Wikipedia article. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk) (cont)  22:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment added. Keep me posted. Piguy101 (talk) 23:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've made the improvements that you have suggested - thank you. Also, to follow-up regarding your requests for clarification, the Foundation's first taxes were filed in 1988, so that would mean that it was established in 1987, although no source I have found specifically states that.  That's why I put 1987-1988 there.  For the illness, the newspaper only states, "a six-month illness," and doesn't specify what it was.  Thanks again, Daniellagreen (talk)  (cont)  04:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll remove the first clarification needed tag. Piguy101 (talk) 04:17, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * When you have a moment, I would like to ask if you would take a look at this and give me some suggestions on how to proceed regarding the editor's unfounded and untrue accusations. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk)  (cont)  20:34, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about this: "mrs gernatt and sir taurus (as well as other horses that were owned by gernatt farms) - which was 50/50 owned by mr and mrs gernatt"? Piguy101 (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes. Carrie has been stalking me, now, on 6 articles that I recently created (3 more since you first questioned her about it, and she didn't respond, but archived your question). She has accused me of paid editing. Those issues are reflected in the attachment that I included in my above-comment. I understand from reading other editors' comments that this is her MO, making Wikipedia her personal battleground. She clearly has an issue with me and my editing, now having unreviewed 3 articles I created. I'm just wondering how to proceed. Thanks, Daniellagreen (talk) (cont)  22:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I also just checked her talk page, and she has already archived my rebuttal to her comments and accusations, just like she did with your question. It seems that this is how she skirts and gets away with her actions.  The policies about dispute resolution state that, after lengthy talk on a user's talk page, if a dispute is not settled, that it can come to dispute resolution.  If there is no talk on the user's talk page, and she is not willing to respond, how is that handled?  And, I recently placed a conflict in dispute resolution, and there was basically no resolution, so I am quite disillusioned with the process.  I am curious as to your thoughts.  All of this just seems so immature to me. Thanks, <b style="color:#7F007F">Daniellagreen</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  22:11, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I read the discussion and Carriearchdale had petty arguments about your behavior (which has seemed good in my perspective, except for the biased canvasing; more neutral requests would have been better). Although I did not quite follow Carriearchdale's first argument (it seemed like WP:POKEMON to me), it could be valid. At this point, I recommend opening up a discussion on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Otherwise, I would be willing to start the discussion on the page from my perspective. Piguy101 (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I wanted to follow-up with you regarding the report against me that was filed by Carriearchdale, and in which I have mentioned you. Thank you for all of your support, and comments regarding this.  The link, as you know, is at: .  For the record, I would like to state that the user's accusations are completely unfounded.  Additionally, if the article, Flavia C. Gernatt is merged, that is no problem.  My concern is that she/he has been stalking and harassing me and my editing, now, for the past week.  Two experienced editors had previously encouraged me not to file a report, so that caused further disillusionment for me, and I wondered if this type of behavior truly is acceptable on Wikipedia.  My further concern is that it does not appear that any of the edits/actions the user has taken in regard to me or my edits have been in good faith; that has been further disillusioning.  I had gone through a different dispute resolution process that I had initiated, and it did not provide any resolution; that is another reason for being disillusioned.  So, I had just chalked all of it up to that is the way that editor is, and her/his conduct is acceptable.  Then, I came back today and found a notification about an administrative report filed against me, and also a sock allegation that was untrue.  Regarding the 'canvassing,' I was not aware that wasn't okay until after I had asked three of you for your suggestions.  Of course, I believe that no one had to answer on the afd talk page, but thought that communications would be on my talk page.  My intention was to want to learn about what to improve, and/or if the request for deletion could be substantiated.  At any rate, I do appreciate your comments and support of me in the report.  I'm glad that I backed off on the situation as I had not wanted to escalate it; it appears that the user did that independently.  Thank you, again, <b style="color:#7F007F">Daniellagreen</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  21:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like we are done with the ordeal. However, I'm not following the incident on the Commons, and I don't plan to, frankly. It appears that Carriearchdale nominated several of your articles for deletion, but I am only following Flavia C. Gernatt. If you would like, tell me the pages that have AfD discussions, and I will try to add my opinion. However, I may not agree with you. Be glad this incident is almost over. Piguy101 (talk) 23:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I have not even gone through them to see which others might have been hit with afd by Carrie. Just to inform you, however, there is an afd nomination at Daniel and Flavia Gernatt Family Foundation, which appears will likely be deleted and/or merged. I did the best I could with that, and have been unable to locate other references showing notability. Deletion and/or merge is understandable. Thanks again for everything! :-) <b style="color:#7F007F">Daniellagreen</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)  <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  23:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. I appreciate the appreciation. Piguy101 (talk) 01:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Niles North High School
Hello, I was reading the Niles North High School page and it says that Arpeet Kamdar is the superintendent which he is not. Please make that edit. He is also mentioned in the notable people section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NN543210 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for editing. You edits (see what you did: ) changed the principal to Dr. Richie Janw. The source I am using says that Dr. Ryan McTague is the principal. Could you find a source that supports that Dr. Richie Janw is the principal? Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 17:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the appreciation. Piguy101 (talk) 01:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

the reason I deleted the Intradeco Holdings page
hello, I wanted to let you know that I was not able to delete the page that I created so I deleted all the content from it. I work for the company Intradeco and my boss told me he wanted the page deleted so I tried to delete it as the original user. any other way I can delete it? or request for a deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaldingTac (talk • contribs) 21:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Since you are not the original creator of the article, you cannot delete the article by blanking its page because that looks like vandalism. Instead, you can nominate it for deletion, and open up a discussion explaining why the article should be deleted. Other editors will offer their opinion, and an administrator will close the nomination and determine the result about a week later. Please see Deletion process for more information. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 22:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Sam Nicholson
I was trying to delete the article on Sam Nicholson because it is totally wrong, he did not go to bathgate he was never a kilmarnock fan and he is very highly regarded at Hearts.He was born in Penicuk and has lived there all his life.Think what you put on these pages and check the facts first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickybo6 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, you have been haphazardly removing content from the article with no explanation, so the edits look like vandalism. Piguy101 (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Sam Nicholson
I was trying to delete the article on Sam Nicholson because it is totally wrong, he did not go to bathgate he was never a kilmarnock fan and he is very highly regarded at Hearts.He was born in Penicuk and has lived there all his life.Think what you put on these pages and check the facts firs, I do however appreciate that perhaps you were given the wrong information at athe time.Sorry should have said if you want information on Sam and I mean correct information please let me know.

regards

Nicky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickybo6 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Sam Nicholson
Brand new to all this just a bit astonished that a young lad can basically be attacked like that I have never seen anything like it in all my years. A bit amazed that anyone can make up stories for the sake of it and add them to the pages on wikipedia. If I have disrupted your pages I would like to offer you an appoligy there was no intent against you personally.

@nickybo6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickybo6 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll let you freely edit the page. Other editors may discuss with you. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Jordangarnett
Well, we both tried to help him, but he's indef'ed after making the same edit yet again. Thanks for the input on my page. Meters (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I am glad to help. Piguy101 (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism?!?
Just wondering why you reverted my edit to The Illinois and tagged it with "Vandalism". All I did was add a missing " }} " on the template transclusion and delete a parameter that wasn't part of the template's syntax. How is that vandalism? --Theodore Kloba (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Your edit was not vandalism. The edit before you was. Sorry to scare you. Piguy101 (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Byron D. Grays
Hi i only un reviewed the disputed factor.

Sulaimandaud (talk) 23:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * It looks like you reviewed Byron D. Grays, but I unreviewed it because I am not sure that it meets the notability guidelines. Sorry for any confusion. Piguy101 (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Phil Kessel
For future reference, your advice here was in direct contradiction to the username policy, in particular this section. The only people allowed to use usernames that are the same as notable living or recently-deceased people are:


 * those individuals themselves, assuming they can prove it to the satisfaction of the querying admin or the Foundation office, or
 * people who coincidentally have the same name and state clearly on their userpages that they are not the person everyone thinks they are.

Since he has continued editing, the name has been reported to UAA and one other admin has asked him about it as well. He said he thought from what you told him that it was OK. I had to advise him to the contrary (and press him about whether he is Kessel or not). Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * You are right. I tried to give qualified advice, (it may be a problem...), but I can see that it is a violation of the username policy. Do you recommend that I post an note/apology on Phil Kessel's talkpage, correcting my error? It seems that you have already explained the problem to him. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Probably a good idea. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Message sent. I hope that it is acceptable. Piguy101 (talk) 20:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

TNA Impact Wrestling
I believe that the Impact Wrestling article should be moved to this article.


 * Hmmm...It looks like TNA iMPACT! was the former name for Impact Wrestling. Is there any reason for you requested move? Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

The current name is Impact Wrestling which which does not make not of the fact that the television show is owned by TNA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malikdahra (talk • contribs) 19:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I am still confused. The current title of the Wikipedia page is Impact Wrestling. TNA Impact Wrestling was a redirect to Impact Wrestling, which means that if a reader typed in TNA Impact Wrestling, they would be automatically taken to Impact Wrestling. Why do you want TNA Impact Wrestling to be deleted and not kept as a redirect? Do you want to make way for a page move? If so, this should be requested on the talkpage. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to make way for a page move. I believe that the the Impact Wrestling article should redirect to TNA Impact Wrestling, so basically the opposite of the way it is now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malikdahra (talk • contribs) 21:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Since I am not truly familiar with the page topic, I suggest that you file a request at Requested moves. I hope that this helps. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Fovea DAB page
Hi,

The changes I made on fovea were to create it as a disambiguation page as opposed to a redirect to fovea centralis. There are 4 parts of the human body with the name fovea (which just means pit in Latin) - in the eye, in the femoral head, on the mandible and on the frontal bone of the skull.

Do you have any objections to me reverting it back and adding the final 2?

Mschamberlain (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and revert. I believe that only one page existed at the time I reverted, but the previous revision now looks fine as a DAB. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

User:LuigiFan777
Hi,

Can U Plz Create My Requested Page LuigiFan777 (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)(User Talk:LuigiFan777) 5:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about the Super Mario 64 DS Theory you have written about? Please see Your first article for help in writing your own first article. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 21:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)