User talk:PikaPal91

October 2013
Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Triple J because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Triple J. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Triple J was changed by PikaPal91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881549 on 2013-10-24T06:51:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Triple J. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)