User talk:Pikachufan1336

September 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disney Vault, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Countries do matter in the Disney Vault article—if you're in a country outside of North America, then Dumbo isn't in the vault for you. Please stop deleting this information. Trivialist (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disney Vault, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 01:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Vault, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 02:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Disney Vault, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 15:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Disney Vault. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Trivialist (talk) 00:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Synthesis
Hi, the information you added to Codename: Kids Next Door in is what the Wikipedia community considers "synthesis". Essentially, it means that you are drawing a conclusion ("The show gained mostly positive reviews from critics and audiences") that is not expressly stated in the sources provided. Typically this sort of conclusion is best left to review aggregators like RottenTomatoes or Metacritic. The other problem with the submission, is that the way it's written seems to support a favorable critical response, and doesn't present a fully balanced, or neutral point of view. For these reasons, I have removed the content. If you were thinking about resubmitting it, I'd recommend only sticking to the facts, and avoiding the WP:PEACOCK phrase "some have even gone far enough to call it one of the greatest animated shows of all time" if what you mean is "one guy even went so far as to call it one of the greatest animated shows of all time." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)