User talk:PikyoSeoul20

June 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lisa Wilkinson have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lisa Wilkinson was changed by PikyoSeoul20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95622 on 2023-06-08T12:57:45+00:00

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Courcelles (talk) 13:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

I see. I almost forgot about that comment. I now understand the reasons behind my block on Wikipedia and I would like to take this reply to sincerely apologise for my actions. I understand that I went too far when it comes to this edit and how serious this case is. Although there are resources that the celebrity in question was involved in the victim's case, I believe the wording could have been more user-friendly or perhaps I should not have gone to the extent to write my edit. I cannot stress enough how bad I now feel as a result of this edit, I'm truly sorry this has happened and I promise that if I am unblocked in the future I will never write such edits again and think before I edit in front of the entire Wikipedia community. Thank you for your attention. Have a nice day :) PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 04:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You may make a new request for someone else to review(on wiki). I would suggest that you not use an AI bot to write it. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello 331dot. How are you? Hope you're well. I need some help with my appeal key. I applied for an unblock request for my Wikipedia account PikyoSeoul20 but the problem is that I forgot to take note of the appeal key and cannot retrieve it. Is there anything I can do to retrieve the appeal key or is there anything you can do to help me with my issue. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
 * Kind Regards,
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

is closed. User is warned to stop deliberately wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 11:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello Yamla.
 * How are you? Hope you are well.
 * I did state in my appeal that I felt really bad for what I have done and that I would think about my actions before completing them in a courteous manner. I also stated that I will never make such edits in the near future.
 * Although disappointed by the status of my appeal, I understand this decision. I am open for feedback on the reasons behind your decline and the ways I can make Wikipedia more safe and generous for the wider online community.
 * Kind Regards,
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 13:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Yamla.
 * I also forgot to mention that I need help with using the talk page to make a request.
 * I am hoping that you could help me out.
 * Kind Regards
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 14:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Yamla.
 * This will be my last reply
 * I no longer need assistance in using my user talk page. You can find my proper appeal down below.
 * Thank you for your assistance.
 * Kind Regards,
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

New Appeal
Hello PhilKnight. Hope you're well. I agree with you. It would be best if I did not make such edits at all. What I was trying to say in my request was that I am still remorseful for the actions I committed last week and that if I were unblocked again, I would make an edit based on true sources and respectful language, not just on the biography of the living person in question but on any living person's biography.

Thank you for your consideration. From PikyoSeoul20

New Unblock Appeal
PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 03:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Seraphimblade. Thank you very much for getting back to me. While disappointed and guttered to learn of the verdict surrounding my recent unblock appeal, I understand and accept this decision. I cannot stress enough how much this issue has made me feel guilty and depressed both on and off the screen. Although you may not envision my changed attitude until the time comes for me to be unblocked, I can assure you that I will change my ways and that I can be a more useful, knowledgeable and trustworthy editor here on Wikipedia. I will be trying the Standard Offer in six months' time as recommended by you and I shall be adamant and true to my words...and don't mind the "garbage" Croucelles cited; that 6-year-old edit was all for fun and was definitely not severe as my recent 'doormat' edit.

Thank you for your reply, Kind Regards, PikyoSeoul20


 * After seeing the "doormat" edit, I honestly wouldn't be comfortable unblocking you unless you agreed to refrain from editing any biographies of living persons at all, indefinitely. That does not mean "permanently"; if you show a solid history of neutral and good-quality editing in other areas, with much better judgment than you demonstrated there, that restriction could be lifted at some point in the future. But do keep in mind that, especially for people who are not major celebrities or extremely well known, their biography on Wikipedia may be the first thing that shows up on search engines when their name is entered, and so unreferenced negative claims and derogatory remarks on such a biography could be extremely damaging to such an individual. That is why we take BLP so seriously. So, would you be willing to agree to a restriction from editing any BLP articles if you were unblocked? Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Am I the only one getting ChatGPT vibes off these appeals? Courcelles (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No, you're not, though unfortunately there's never any way to tell with much certainty. Apparently even the bot-detection checkers aren't tremendously accurate. But that's one reason why I like to ask a question it would be really tough for a chatbot to give any kind of coherent answer to. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Courcelles
 * How are you? I hope you're well.
 * I can assure that you that ChatGPT or any other AI bot was not used when writing these messages and replies. They were genuinely written by me.
 * This is the same writing style I have adapted throughout my secondary schooling and at university and has received positive feedback from teachers, students and family members alike. Are you impressed? Lol
 * Kind Regards,
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 06:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Seraphimblade.
 * Thank you for your reply. I'm happy to say that I do agree with you and I'm happy for a restriction to be placed on me if I am unblocked. I promise that from now on I will become a more thoughtful and trustful editor on Wikipedia.
 * Kind Regards,
 * PikyoSeoul20 PikyoSeoul20 (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * , would you be okay with an unblock on condition that this editor may not edit any BLPs? Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Not really, no. These LLM appeals are worthless. I’d revoke talk page access and forget about this. “editor”. Courcelles (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * And the garbage has been here for years despite the like 8 edits before the indef. Courcelles (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)