User talk:Pile-Up

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page SANE (charity) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.ctono.freeserve.co.uk/id55.htm (matching the regex rule \bfreeserve\.co\.uk\b). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

good work on the rethink article however
the criticism you cited on the rethink article is now very out of date. Evidence that it actually | saves money (rather than an expensive waste of money) and the employment outcome data is good (with good RCTs). I removed your paragraph as it was misleading, given the new evidence. Cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That 2003 psychiatrist piece was more for balance of viewpoints, given the narrative of straightforward acceptance from 1995 onwards that's there (the iris refs all seem to be broken btw). But some of the issues it raised are still contentious. Anyway I'll reply at the article if need be. Pile-Up (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

need inline references
I added a | reference section. the new articles will get deleted if there are no references. Cheers Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, didn't get round to putting the text links into ref tags on that one. Pile-Up (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

New Horizons
Wanted to let you know that I moved the article to New Horizons (England), since it's a more appropriate title. I've updated the disambiguation page to reflect the change. Cheers! Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 15:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Pile-Up (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

reference to include
found some reference from literature Earlypsychosis (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Spectrum (psychiatry)
Thanks for all the good work you've done there; could you please review my concern at Talk:Spectrum (psychiatry)? Thanks, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 20:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind: I see you have! (Catching up on my watchlist ... )  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 20:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of European Federation of Families of People with Mental Illness


The article European Federation of Families of People with Mental Illness has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced for 12 years. No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of New Horizons (strategy) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Horizons (strategy) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New Horizons (strategy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Elshad (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)