User talk:Piledhigheranddeeper/Archives08

City of Adelaide (1864)
As you are a previous editor of City of Adelaide (1864), you may be interested in the Style Proposal on Talk:City of Adelaide (1864) ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for thoughts on the article talk
  Thank you for reflecting the Gerechtigkeitsspirale!

Did you know ... that a church's 1510 spiral of justice declares: "Justice suffered in great need. Truth is slain dead. Faith has lost the battle"?

The poem ends with "Praise the right thing". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Space Shuttle Programme
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Indian Space Shuttle Programme. &#x0020;Requesting you to add your opinion. Regards Thanks. M.srihari (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Srihari

Per Holknekt
Please take a look at the article Per Holknekt that I have created. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've taken a few whacks at it. My principal concern is the information that is not there.  There is almost nothing, for example, on his first 20 years of life: parents' names, siblings (other than Thomas), education, etc.  I have inserted a number of hidden comments in the text where more information would be useful. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Per Holknekt
Materialscientist (talk) 01:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=670550534 your edit] to International Civil Aviation Organization airport code may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Don't think that was me (sukkah)! --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Article
Please take a look at the article Jenny Skavlan that I created today. Appreciate it.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Great read on your profile page
I enjoyed reading the stuff on your profile page. Thanks for having it that way. EggsInMyPockets (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, the least we can do is to have a little fun while disseminating the world's knowledge! Thanks for the compliment. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Radio in Mexico
Hey, I saw your text question on Radio in Mexico, which I wrote.

The 1,750 figure includes all licensed AM, FM and shortwave radio stations, including commercial and the various noncommercial types. It does not include pirate radio stations, of which there are decent numbers (and which are illegal and seized from time to time), etc. The breakdown is 1,316 commercial and 434 noncommercial.

It does include some double counting, because of the way the figure is counted; all AM-FM combos are double-counted, and there are also 10 listed boosters (in the cited table, "EC", equipos complementarios). It is nigh impossible to find any info on boosters; we used to have scarcely better luck getting info on TV relay transmitters.

It's a fairly accurate number. The US has north of 15,000 separate radio stations plus 6,000 FM translators and boosters and 1,300 LPFMs. I expect the FM numbers to start spiking when they finally reduce the station spacing to 400 kHz and open the floodgates to new radio stations across the country. Raymie (t • c) 06:15, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for clearing this up. I did not realize that Mexico has about one-tenth as many stations as the United States (I can certainly understand counting both sides of an AM-FM pair, and I sympathize with difficulties in getting info on retranslators/boosters). --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The main problem is that Mexico has insisted on 800 kHz station spacing for a very long time (e.g. 90.5, 91.3, 92.1). They are finally getting the ball rolling on cutting that down to 400. That should mean new FMs even in Mexico City for the first time in forever. Raymie (t • c) 15:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

OTD error
Sorry, but that OTD item never said what you claimed it said. That's why article or template histories are useful. Never mind. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Allegra Versace
If you want to, you can take a look at the article about Allegra Versace. That article is this weeks TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MenAreLikeStreetcarsCover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MenAreLikeStreetcarsCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:StagLineCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StagLineCover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:FirstLoveFarewell.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:FirstLoveFarewell.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:HeartSpecialist.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HeartSpecialist.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please don't mark the addition or removal of cleanup tags as minor: see Help:Minor edit. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 08:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Maudie'sDiaryCast.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Maudie'sDiaryCast.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:StagLineCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:StagLineCover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:MenAreLikeStreetcarsCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MenAreLikeStreetcarsCover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Interesting that the non-free rationales painstakingly uploaded in response to these messages were ignored... --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Oba Chandler
If you find time for it, please take a look at the article about Oba Chandler. It is a article that I have edited a lot over the years. So any improvements etc are welcomed. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 09:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)