User talk:Pillaw

Whats up

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to I Am Charlotte Simmons, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: I Am Charlotte Simmons was changed by Pillaw (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95603 on 2011-01-03T16:31:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I Am Charlotte Simmons. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Jncraton (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Baptiste de La Salle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SMasters (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominic Pilla Black Hawk Down


A tag has been placed on Dominic Pilla Black Hawk Down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A520 &#124; Talk me away! 16:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)