User talk:Pilotguy/Archive7

Just going through the block log...
... and I saw that you did a lot of blocking. Wow, people come up with the strangest names these days. Examples: WIKIPEDIA ON WHEELS MUHAHAHA DIE JIMBO WALES, FUCKJAPANFUCKJAPANFUCKJAPANFUCKJAPAN, 8==============D, etc. Fredil Yupigo 03:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Blogospheres of The World
Hi, I was trying to help save Romanian blogosphere by putting it into a more substantive global context, could you please undelete so I can add more countries? Thanks. Attic Owl 15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

nonsense protologism?
Okay Pilotguy I can be a reasonable guy but your kind of a party pooper.

You deleted the term chillax because it is as you say "nonsense protologism". you may have heard of the term protologism, big deal! But here is another term you should look up. It's called humor. Laugh a little man. Maybe you should chillax. I dont care if I lose my account for this but I just had to say it loud and clear, Your a party pooper.

Why did you block me?

WoW is World of Warcraft. I've never heard of the Willy on Wheels.

User talk:Whitholm
Pilotguy, please can you protect this page to prevent this user from abusing the unblock?? Ta. --TheM62Manchester 17:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Help?
Can you block the user User:72.144.236.213 He keeps adding userboxes and rubbish to my talk and user pages. - Mike Beckham 23:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * He continues to flood my talk page with nonesense, could it be locked or the user be blocked please I am sick of reverting it. - Mike Beckham 00:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Done. -- Pilotguy ( roger that ) 00:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I think he is using sockpuppets, he is doing it under a new ip User:65.9.96.109. Both Bellsouth Atlanta. Can my talk and/or user pages be locked for a bit? - Mike Beckham 01:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

AOL talk pages, and the persistent restoration of warnings several years old
As much as I appreciate your passive agressive response as opposed to out right aggression, I'm afraid I still don't understand the point of what you're doing, the only thing it does it makes sure there's always an available reason to block an AOL IP, but beyond that, why do you keep doing it? You've restored out of date warnings on dozens of AOL talk pages in the last few weeks, in the process, removing all of the recent warnings, and replacing them with out dated ones--AOL account 23:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You don't seem to understand, in most of the cases where you've restored random warnings to AOL talk pages it was the last edit to that page, since I have all of them watch listed I see this first hand, the amount of AOL vandalism gets exaggerated, it's almost an urban legand, but first hand, there's maybe 1 or 2 major warnings a night that pop up on my watch list. And each time that happens you personally restore each and every warning going all the way back to 2004 when AOL started using this stupid proxy system in the first place.--AOL account 00:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

True or Flase?

 * 1) AOL doesn't use XTP Headers..
 * 2) Without them there is no way for a 'new message' to reach the correct page..
 * 3) New messages can never reach the correct person, unless they're on a semi static (the 172s)..
 * 4) Dropping warnings into the AOL proxy pool just leaves dozens of 'new messages' floating around until they hit someone..
 * --AOL account 00:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I really don't give a shit about AOL (and you shouldn't either, unless you are an employee, which you appear to be acting like). All I know is that you ignored what I had to write, and you somehow think that taking control of the AOL portion of Wikipedia as well as shoving nonsense into other people's heads is going to change people's minds. It is not. There is nothing I am doing out of process, and there is nothing you are doing out of process. Kindly refrain from filling my talk page with nonsense. -- Pilotguy ( roger that ) 00:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You of course seem to be leaving out the obvious "and you shouldn't either, unless you are.... using AOL?" And there actually is a guidline on this somewhere, WP:SIZE for one, and surely using popups to revert non-vandalism..--AOL account 00:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to continue this stupidly pathetic conversation. I appreciate your worrying of me, but please mind your own business from now on. -- Pilotguy ( roger that ) 00:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 31st


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Elefant
Please unprotect the page or leave it with IP block only (as it was only an IP vandal). Thank you. --Denniss 11:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The troll is back, please install IP-block/Semi block but do not totally protect the page. --Denniss 17:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Jgwlaw
Thanks for getting in touch over this issue. You might like to amend the bit "and I hope the same can be said of you", as it appears to imply there is some indication that I would not work with you over it, and there is absolutely none. In fact, I already have this user box (which I devised) on my user page:) I was emailed by Jgwlaw but my reply bounced back as "unknown or illegal alias". As in her message she stated, "I intend to pursue this as a formal complaint," my reply anyway was to state, "As you have threatened me with a formal complaint, I have nothing more to communicate with you by email."

I received an email from her husband Gwfesq, headed "How Authoritarian of you", accusing me of "paranoid thinking", "your attack upon me" and "You and your 3 admin friends got your panties in a wad at JAWESQ and I, perhaps for cause, perhaps not and you elected to use your power as admin to silence JAWESQ as part of personal vendetta. Then you made sure to spread it around on other people's talk pages in the guise that they were mentioned in a transparent attempt to defame." (As a courtesy I had simply informed those people whom I had mentioned in my statement on AN/I.)

He also emailed to say, "I hate to break it you, but if she is bouncing emails back, she is already no longer communicating with you." I received 2 other emails from him, the last of which included, "I do think I was set up by Weregerbil, so you may call me paranoid. But remember, just because you think someone is out to get you, doesn't mean they aren't. I have been around corporate /big firm politics long enough, I should have seen it coming. First the "friendly" sock puppet warning then the threat to ban as a sock puppet. It was a declaration of war, not a friendly warning." I have seen nothing to doubt that Weregerbil is caring and was acting in good faith. I said after that I wasn't prepared to continue the dialogue.

I have no problem leaving this in your hands at the moment to take whatever action you see fit. I would suggest that if Jgwlaw's block is lifted so she can comment on AN/I then it should be on the condition that she is only allowed to comment on that page, but again I leave this to your discretion. After the reaction to the block, my own sympathy is with Samir's suggestion that it should be extended until we can see that editing privileges will not be abused.

Let me know if you need to see the contents of the emails or if I can help in any other way.

Tyrenius 00:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

PS I remain concerned as Jglaw's last post (to date) is still unable to see the situation in any other terms than "character assassination". Tyrenius 01:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Copied from my talk page (Tyrenius) FYI
Hi Tyrenius. In the context of the new article James J. Shapiro, I think it would be fair to unblock User:Jgwlaw so she can participate in discussion on it. If her behaviour continues to be inappropriate, the threshold for restoring the block would of course be at your discretion. Many thanks -- Samir  धर्म 02:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Samir, personally I consider her previous behaviour and her subsequent behaviour since the block has forfeited her right for the time being for editor privileges, as there is every sign that they would continue to be abused, so I am not lifting the block. I consider from my discussions with the article creator User:WAS 4.250 that he has been scrupulous in wishing to apply NPOV encyclopedic standards and that Jgwlaw's response would be from an unrelenting POV that any attempt to biog Shapiro is in fact part of some wiki campaign of "lawyer bashing". However, I have no objection to you or Pilotguy (see his talk page) removing the block, provided you are prepared to deal with the consequences. Thanks for asking. :) I knew the article was being rewritten, but had no idea it was going to be uploaded, by the way.  Tyrenius 02:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I defer to your better judgment. The behaviour certainly has been egregious.  Take care -- Samir   धर्म 02:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

End of copied talk

James J. Shapiro
Please see Talk:James J. Shapiro. Tyrenius 03:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't leave garbage on my talk page
... like you just did. Apparently you're referring to a page I haven't edited at all in over 36 hours and didn't revert more than three times even then. Thanks. --Gary Will 01:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

There is talk relevant to the above on Garywill talk page. Tyrenius 05:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Rizzin
Hi -

I noticed that you blocked the above user for adding stupid Colbert-inspired comments to elephant-related articles. Just a couple of comments: I was having a conversation about the user at about the same time, asking them to stop, and was a little surprised to find that they had been blocked without a warning or block template being added to their talk page. I also see that the block is indefinite, which seems a little harsh, notwithstanding the stupidity of the offence. I appreciate that the situation was getting out of hand, but we should try not to WP:BITE. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Template AOL
Piltoguy, I know you don't agree but you have not talked about it on the talk pager and you have presented no evidence of your own. This is not "fairness" it is laziness, and as you are involved in the dispute!Acting fairly would have been to protect it when there were multiple 3RRs and resolving it on the talk pages. Reverting to your OWN version in an edit war, then protecting.. tsk tsk... you know better than this. Anyway, I have explained my own reasons on the talk page, just reiterating what I and others have said before, please reply. -- Dark fred Talk to me 14:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Houston edit war
Hi, you don't know me but I used to be an Admin a long time ago (like until last year).

How about blocked both the edit warriors at Houston, Texas, so the rest of us can get back to editing it?

Oh, you did alread. Thanks. --Uncle Ed 01:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I'm not blocked! Thanks! Cedric31 22:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Daniel.Bryant and Graal unixmad
I'm always wary of editing protected pages, regardless of "status", so was wondering if you'd mind doing so for me, or simply stating you don't mind if I do? Daniel's upset that there are personal attacks against him on User talk:Graal unixmad, and asked me to remove them. Awaiting your reply. :) ~Kylu (u|t)  06:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

1t expired
I turned off the computer and left lt over night.

After that it went away.

Glitch perhaps?

How did you get your talk page like this?

I lIke the way lt Is so organized.

Thanks for your help,-- Missingno . (talk)(contribs) 15:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

See the period, click on it.

Emil Kolb
I believe a consensus has been reached as to how the disputed quote should be presented. Please see Talk:Emil Kolb. Oz  Lawyer   18:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Languages
Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!!  Abdullah Geelah 14:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Protection of User:MonsterOnTheLake
Regarding [ this]: I have unprotected the page because it is not apparent which, if any, of the edits the user made to his own user page are vandalism. Kimchi.sg 01:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

When You Revert A Page Back Several Edits, Please Give A Valid Reason
I think we deserve a more valid reason why you reverted Twitches 2, especially given it was under a speedy delete (it is pure speculation) back to August 1. User:Lord Hawk 14:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Ryulong RFA
Hi Pilotguy... techinically I'm not supposed to be here... I was blocked for reverting a FALSE incest quote complete with bogus source that Ryulong fought very hard to uphold on the Jeremy Clarkson article. (ITS ALL IN THE HISTORY) It's a long story... but regardless... I was OPPOSITION vote 16 and my vote was deleted by #3 supporter within 90 seconds!!, MrLefty and my suspension was increased to TWO weeks instead of one, I believe, so that I'd miss the end vote. Ryulong, along with his ASDMIN bully friends have pretty much destroyed my enjoyment of the site. When I first discovered the FALSE quote, I deleted it citing that "IF YOURE GONNA SAY THAT JEREMY SAID THAT ALL OF USA PRACTICES INCEST, THEN YOU'LL NEED TO BACK IT UP" as it seems too controversial. He reverted me 3 or 4 times claiming that "jeremy could have easily said that"...(Im trying to make this short as possible)... he deleted it... I tried to open a topic on the JC talk page and he deleted my topic 6 times then had me blocked by his admin buddies for VANDALISM I think? Anyway... I told THIS story on the admin page where instead of being smug, rude and cocky, he apologised to me and removed the quote saying that it was a mistake. This was certainly not a mistake... he tried fervently to keep tha page innaccurate and I have been blocked for suspending him and have also had a valid vote thwarted.

I just thought that you should know about it because of your NEUTRAL vote.

Although the page now is just how I think it should be(factual), I am now very concerned that this chap will be ADMIN. He and his admin bully buddies can make life miserable for a LOT of wikifolk. It's just not cool.

You know how the kid acts nice and sweet when the teacher is watching and then twists your nipple when the teacher is not looking... thats what this guy does.

When the edit war was going on, his gang suspended me and then he told me "I AM ACTUALLY LAUGHING OUT LOUD".

Is this a fake vote from MrLefty?--->

Heres the one where they deleted my vote--->

I'm sure you know that I have waged a small war against this editor, Ryulong using a number of IPs and ISPs, but that does not invalidate anything I have said here.

Please look into my claims... I haven't lied and I think that you will see that my claims are true. If you have any sway AT ALL... don't let this 18yr old testosterone fueled, egomaniac become ADMIN. He will abuse the tools and will only bring misery.

Is that normal to delete someone's topic from a discussion seven times? Seems unfair somehow. He has no powers yet, but abuses his knowledge over others.

Mate, I'm very sorry for the essay.

Thanks for reading.

YourCousin--86.29.114.78 16:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 7th


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

GHe's RfA


WP:RFA/LtPowers
Sorry if I'm mistaken, but aren't we supposed to list the user's RfA at Requests for adminship prior to them accepting? As per "If you nominate a user, leave a message on their talk page and ask them to reply here if they accept the nomination.", from the WP:RFA page, I thought that was the case. Sorry if I'm mistaken but I'm new to RfAs. Nice user page, BTW. &mdash; `C RAZY `( IN )`S ANE ` 17:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstars
I can not believe that your page has been vandalized so many times so I am giving you this barnstar.

RfA thanks

 * There's an admin IRC channel? That's so cool! —  Mets 501  (If responding, please do so on my talk page) 13:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 14th


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
This is a minor issue but it looked to me like Notes and Best Friends had been improved so it didn't fit WP:CSD when you deleted it.

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 00:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Your block on 71.230.240.24
Hi Pilotguy, I'm reviewing your block on 71.230.240.24 (talk • contribs • [ page moves ] • block user • [ block log ]), and it looks like the anon is correct: after being warned with a test3, he didn't make a disruptive edit. Could you let me know which edit (made after the test3) made you decide to block him? Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for looking at it so quickly. --Deathphoenix ʕ 20:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for handling this matter, Deathphoenix. This now closes one of the saddest chapters in internet history. --71.230.240.24 20:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Your rollback at Wikipedia
Hi. This rollback of yours strikes me as odd. Did you intend to do that? Jkelly 22:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding 71.230.240.24
I'm sorry about the premature report - I added 71.230.240.24 as soon as he left a message on my talk page calling me "racist", and by the time he had clarified his statement and apologized, he had already been blocked. I was going to request an unblocking for him, but thankfully, you already did. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 01:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Award
Wow, thank you so much for the barnstar and the words accompanying it. It came at just the right time too, since my Wikistress has been rather high lately. Thank you very much for thinking of me and taking the time to award it. :) All the best --  Bane s  07:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The revert was much appreciated
Thanks so much! :D--Sakura Avalon 01:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Imposters
Wow, you're very popular! All I get is a Dope and a Pope. Cheers -- Samir  धर्म 02:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Indeed :) -- Pilotguy ( roger that ) 03:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Er... here's more... Christ, what did you do to this guy?! :p &mdash; riana_dzasta &bull; t &bull; c &bull; e  &bull; ER &bull; 03:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * User:PilotguyDoYouLikeGeometricPlanesOrWingedOnesThatGoZoom?
 * User:Pilotguy has attitudes and movements
 * User:LetsSmokeSomePCPAndThenFlyAPlane.You'reWelcomeToJoinMe,PilotGuy

Why revert?
I am curious as to why my edits to the Epcot page are being reverted by you almost instantly after I make them. My intent is to remove some of the subjectivity in the article, correct some incorrect information, and add some points not previously addressed. Is this not the point of Wikipedia editing? Mkb000 18:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for getting that vandal sock (the airport vandal?) for me... Wikipedia wasn't loading and I had to go anyway. --W.marsh 18:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wdefcon
Like I said on digital_me's talk, sorry about the erroneous level change. I assumed things were back to normal because the RC feed started back up, but I should've done more investigation. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

AOL unblock
Hello sir can you please unblock AOL? This is the first time I have tried editing and am experiencing problems because of something you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakoani (talk • contribs)

Defender of the wiki
That tag was put on by me and was cut and pasted from another I just wanted to put a difrrent not linking to another article's deletion discussion

Thanks!
Thank you for reverting the vadalism on my userpage!  Hagerman ( talk ) 23:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

User talk page
Why did you remove my reply from my user talk page? Deuterium 02:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 21st


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Block summary
Here's a new block summary next time you block a Willy on Wheels sockpuppet (fictitious accounts listed here!):
 * Pilotguy blocked William on Tires with an expiry time of indefinite (you've lost your licence to be "on wheels", Willy!)
 * Pilotguy blocked Willy is Automobiles On Axles with an expiry time of indefinite (Alastair Stewart from Police, Camera, Action! has you on record for attempted WoW-like behaviour!)

Heh-heh, are these good?? Better than {user...),anyhow... --TheM62Manchester 18:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

AO?

 * 2006-08-23T06:45:45 Pilotguy (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked ALL OF AOL WILL WORSHIP PISSCHRIST, OR SUFFER THE AUTOBLOCK (contribs) (reblocking anon only)

Please remember anon-only option works only on IPs. Thank you. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 22:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

GIen's RfA: Thank you!
'''PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)'''

Hey buddy, thanks for everything - especially all the advice and tips on IRC - it's really appreciated. See you on the front lines! - GI e n 06:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism
Thanks for keeping my Userpage clean. It's much appeciated. Also I do believe you deserve this(even though you probably already have it) The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar