User talk:Pilotguy/Archive8

3 revert rule
Can you block BerrtilVidet for vandalizing by reverting legitimate entries in the NationalSecurity Council page four or five times in a row, clearly violating Wikipedia rules? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.122.113.10 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 8 October 2006.
 * Your edits appeared as vandalism, such as seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?

Dear pilot guy. When you are not busy bombing the muslim civilians or profiling and throwing out the middle eastern looking passanges from your plane, can you look at the content that Bertil Videt, your kind, is not allowing? Thanks.#

I won't even bother answering the Armenian Genocide-maniac french cutie. Let her enjoy with what they got away with in Algeria and rest of Africa.

title=National_Security_Council&diff=prev&oldid=80237506 here]. And then your rather rude remarks in response to the removal of your vandalism, as seen here. Doesn't matter anyways, you're blocked. -HurricaneJeanne 17:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Moving Template talk:User copyright
Hi, I saw that you closed (with userfy - I can only agree, but since I was involved I couldn't close it myself with a clean conscience) TfD (and forgot to sign, naughty, naughty ;) and moved the template to User:Mistress Selina Kyle/User Copyright. Would ya mind if we moved the page into one of the userbox archives (like Mira's or mine) instead? CharonX /talk 21:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

O'Connor and Goldberg
Can you retrieve the text from this deleted article O'Connor and Goldberg. I need the information to add to Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs)

Signpost updated for August 28th


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Removing old warnings
Please don't re-add old warnings to anon IPs pages, eg. Old warnings add no value. The repeat vandal template gives adequate history of blocks and an indication that there has been trouble from the IP before. Anons may well not know the protocol of scrolling down the bottom of the page - the message will be lost in the noise of messages quite possibly not addressed to that user. I have discussed my approach at Wikipedia talk:Removing warnings poll and received some support and no discouragement.--Arktos talk 01:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

A RfA thank you from en:User:Xyrael
I'd like to thank you  Pilotguy  for either supporting, opposing, commenting, nominating, reading, editing, promoting and/or anything else that you may have done for my successful request for adminship (I've broken the one thousand sysop barrier!); I'm thanking you for getting involved, and for this I am very grateful. I hope to be able to serve Wikipedia more effectively with my new tools and that we can continue to build our free encyclopedia, for knowledge is power, but only wisdom is liberty. Please do feel free to get in touch if you feel you can improve me in any way; I will be glad to listen to all comments. Again, thanks 8)            &mdash;Xyra e l / 11:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Tobias
He can't give a reason, his page is protected. I put that on there for him. Just review the history of the talk page, I'm sure that will show it. pschemp | talk 19:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Unblocking
Thanks ^_^ polkium 20:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 5th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Harry Chandler on deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Harry Chandler. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Aecis AppleknockerFlophouse 23:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 11th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

User talk:70.246.220.246
Kudos to you, sir. I saw that he had vandalised the article, and went to check his talk page to see if he had been warned. I made the mistake of reading it whilst drinking from a glass of water, however. Congratulations on having a sense of humour. Sometimes vandal-fighting can get tedious otherwise. :) --Dreaded Walrus 22:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

hehe. :) // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 18:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

HeH

 * Ahh... With that edit summary I thought I was really in trouble ;D! 68.39.174.238 02:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!
Ahoy there, captain!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte!  hoopydink Conas tá tú? 05:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Template: Cite your edits
Thank you for closing the cagtegory. I do hope to see it get more regular use on pages to increase civility and WP:RS/ WP:V. ThuranX 04:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem. // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 18:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Template: Infobox Scientist
Dear Pilotguy, Thank you for closing off this TfD debate. You say 'YIKES' there is no consensus, however I'd like to point out a few things. Firstly, please check my arithmetic but I make it that 35 people were for either keeping the template or at least making modifications. I make it that 19 people wanted a straight delete. So the swing is toward modifying the template. The discussion on which fields should be retained, and which should be trimmed is occuring here. Please check this out. It looks like a consensus on which template fields to delete is converging. Please advise what the proper way to proceed is. Best regards, bunix 17:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC) PS: Please also note that those voting 'delete' did try to bias the voting in their favour by deleting the TfD notice off the template under the pretext that it looked 'ugly'. Sheesh! Thus 2-3 days of voting went by with many users oblivious to what was going on. We eventually fought to get the TfD notice back on. That's why you'll see a big cabal of "delete" early on in the debate, and then the "keep" weighing in later in the debate. Another rather underhanded trick the 'delete' brigade did was to manually remove the template itself from the 40 most popular articles, in the middle of the debate, thus hiding the TfD notice from visibility. I suspect if all these shenanigans had not occured there would be a clearer consensus for "keep." What should we do about those 40 semi-vandalised articles? Hours of painstaking work has been removed.

Signpost updated for September 18th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

TfD
Hi there, you closed many discussions for TfD, however, you closed two with consensus to delete and you didn't delete them. Perhaps they slipped through the net. They were Template:MyBabble and Template:User FORTH-1. Cheers. --Bob 16:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Pocahontas Middle School
Thanks for protecting the page from anonymous edits. --Pi3832 15:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Impostor
What is the reason for deleting this template, or alternatively Template:Similar. They are useful for establishing that a user account is not in fact that account of the person they were imitating, so it is clear that the real person was not actually banned. Of course, this is not necessary or, I think, appropriate for accounts which are named so it is obviously not the user, and those should be replaced with the indefinite block template. The other alternative is to use redirects to the real person, but the problem with that is it can give the impression that the edits by the impostor were actually the edits of the real person using an alternative account. So, in cases where there are such edits, the impostor template should be kept. —Centrx→talk • 18:12, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

RE: User:86.134.235.110
Heads up- user has continued vandalising after your warning. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME 23:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

65.30.152.217
Hi there, i'm interested in why you've felt it necessary to block for a month? While the user did make legal threats they were made due to misunderstanding and frustration with personal info being posted on their talk page, see Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive136.

That edit was made a few days back, and we don't block users to punish them... Thanks/wangi 17:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually i've just unblocked the user - give me a shout if you disagree. Thanks/wangi 17:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Ukrainian Professional Football Clubs List
Re: Your closure of the TfD debate here - was just wondering why you decided keep when consensus was quite clearly delete? I presume you just made an accidental mistake - if so could you please revise your decision and delete the template? Thanks. Qwghlm 11:12, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I was going to post a reply on this as well..No one vouched for keeping it, so I'm assuming that its a mistake as well. Cheers, -- Palffy 20:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 25th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

request userfy Template:Alex Jones
Hi, could you please provide me with source and edit history of Template:Alex Jones? Thanks! &mdash; Xiutwel (talk) 07:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Erik Möller
I don't think this qualified for speedying as a repost and salting the earth, as Erik has become a board member of the WMF since the previous deletion and the article has never been deleted non-speedily. If Florence Nibart-Devouard and Angela Beesley have articles, then Erik should be at least worth a debate. Would you mind restoring the article (and possibly AFDing it) or should I take this to DRV? Note that Michael E. Davis redirects to Wikimedia Foundation, another possibility instead of a Deletedpage. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 09:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Seconded. G4's for consensus-deleted articles, this seemed improper.  --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, G4 is a criteria for speedy deletion, which is what I did so, thank you for pointing that out to me. // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 01:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You have to actually read the critera you're using: G4: "A substantially identical copy, by any title, of a page that was deleted as a result of a discussion in Articles for deletion or another XfD process...This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions." Should we bring this to DRV or will you be undeleting this and choosing a possible AfD? --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
I very much appreciate you unblocking me. I won't let you down! Especially since I haven't vandalized a thing in my life. (except for a tree when I was in grade 4.) Cfrydj 21:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Than you from 08toi

Vandalism warning on my user talk page
I received a vandalism warning on my user talk page bearing your signature. The warning was placed by User:216.7.254.254 and I believe it likely to be a spoof of your signature. See this diff and three subsequent ones; the addition was kindly reverted by User:LittleOldMe. Regards, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

funny, ain't it?

Heh. :) // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 13:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you from unblocking me from 08toi.

Deletion/Protection on my page
I recently found that you had deleted and protected my former Wikipage Benjamin_Nicholas, for what reason i'm unaware of. It had merit within the scope of the posting and to delete it indiscriminantly isn't quite understood. It seems i had some issues with other users vandalizing the page, but that could have been fixed with simple blocks rather than a whole deletion.

I move for reinstatement of this page, as you have other authors, bloggers, sex-workers and adult industry persons on Wikipedia. Why was this particular page singled-out for example? I find it bigoted and discriminatory.

Regards, BenjaminNicholas 21:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)BenjaminNicholas ( talk to me )

Niwot High School
Thanks for the backup. Several weeks back, that page degenerated into a ridiculous blog where a bunch of students constantly posted their gripes about the school. I put some notes for them on Talk:Niwot High School on the theory that someone in that school is above the mental age of 8, but that seems not to be the case. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Tell me about it. // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 18:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

TfD
I recently put up Template:Rennes and template:Troyes for deletion and both were deleted, but I actually wanted all templates in ‎Category:French Football Club Templates(here) to be deleted. I can only put up one template at a time so I see how you were confused and only deleted the ones I actually put up. Basically, I wanted you to delete the rest of the templates in the above category so they can be piped. The original TfD debate is at Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 9. Thanks! Reywas92 Talk 21:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Whoosh. All gone. Kudos. // Pilotguy (Have your say ) 18:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Activate redirection
Hi Pilotguy, just wondering why Activate was redirected to Rhodes University. I doesn't appear to be a good fit and there is no mention of activate on that page. Thanks, Diverman 13:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:216.17.228.120
Sorry to bother you, but you are one of the few admins I know. The user above has had a large history of vandalism (see here), and I would like you to indefinitely block him. Thank you very much! <font style="background:#7FFF00">Reywas92 <font style="background:#00ff7f">Talk 20:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 9th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Woody Allen
HELLO can you fix this someday...when you get the chance...

Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn, 35 years. She was his stepdaugher and 22 years old at start of the relationship. They married on December 24, 1997 and the relationship is ongoing as of 2006. This was his third marriage. They had two adopted daughters.

i'm not a woody allen fan (since he stop making funny movies 30 years ago), but Soon-Yi was not his "stepdaughter." She was his girlfriend's stepdaughter. They never lived together before (Woody and Mia lived apart) they started "dating." It was Mia who kept putting them together and making them go on "dates" before they started "dating." Woody never even stayed overnight at Mia's because he didn't like to use her toilet (for shit). He had his own place in NY a mile away (which is 100 miles in montana). This is all public knowledge...ya ya ya

email me with any questions: arthurraleigh@yahoo.com if you get the time can you tell me why the "Age Disparity in Relationships" list was removed from the Wikipedia yes i watched the fight on Wiki, and might have even contributed, but how was it, the list, harmful to what wikipedia is or wants to be... thanks, art

ps. like i said i'm not a woody allen fan i'm just a fan of the truth 69.113.7.179 12:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)art


 * ...Why in the world are you bringing me into this? // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Have your say ) 20:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Editing blocked user
Re: your block of, you should probably consider re-starting and/or lengthening the block on the sockmaster, no? —Wknight94 (talk) 20:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked user editing again
He's back as User:89.172.204.126. I suggest lengthening User:Afrika paprika's block. However, you did not revert the blocked user's edits as you said on his talk page (his edits on Pagania, Travunia, Zahumlje and Doclea). I suggest you also take a look at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents to better grasp the whole controversy over this... well, troll (ping: not styled as such by me, but the admins!). --PaxEquilibrium 21:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and I missed this one as well: User:89.172.232.157. --PaxEquilibrium 21:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

RECENT Activity
I'd like to discuss recent activity with you. Hu12 has taken NAZI like power hungry approach to editing any link added or taken away from a page. Wiki is an open system and if the linked to site is non comercial and a valuable asset it should not be removed without a trial time period or discussion, instead he has gone ballisitic deleting any and every site, commnet, content he finds that he THINKS is affiliated or associated with one account which he's been dead wrong with and nuked many high qualuty sites that fell victim to his poor asumptions and sleuth work. I suggest a truce otherwise the barage will continue 7 days a week 24 hours a day, and contrib he makes will be reversed. We want an equitable intelligent resolution to this for him to back off, relax and make more intelligent edits and not to attack pages that have nothing to do with any of this. EXTERNAL links ARE allowed on this site as long as they are non commercial and meaningful. IT IS NOT solely up to HIS discretion what is allowed or not allowed. This is a community. Please respond I want to know his balisitic unintelligent BLIND editing will be curbed or this WILL continue — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.116.12 (talk • contribs)

205.188.116.65, 152.163.100.195, 152.163.100.203, 205.188.116.6, 152.163.100.11, 205.188.116.136, 152.163.100.198, 64.12.117.9, 64.12.116.13, 152.163.100.199, 64.12.116.12, 209.174.137.10, 152.163.101.6, 64.12.117.6, 64.12.116.136, 152.163.100.130, 64.12.117.10 to name just a few. quite abit of vandalism. this isnt the first time a spammer gets all upset because they were caught breaking policy, and im sure it won't be the last.
 * All of your edits have either been adding external links, or complaining/threatening when those links are removed. Please contribute to the encyclopedia instead of trying to use it to advertise your sites. EinsteinEdits is behind it, (the only one with "dogs" in the fight) he posts under alot of different ip's namely 64.12.116.195,

This guy posts as MountainLife at digitalpoint.com, and has recently decided to sell his site, quote: "Would like to field some offers for these, TMX-ELMO.NET, TMX-ELMO.ORG,TMXELMO.ORG, I think it's a pretty potent package". The first noticeable spamming was www.tmx-elmo.org, was Created On:19-Sep-2006, and does not appear in the search engines. and has been added and re-added Eleven times This is an alarming amount of spam, whats disterbing is his other sites are in MountainLife's signature (which after posting this on wiki he removed), and have been spammed on wiki also examples: www.cocaine-drink.com (  under IP 205.188.116.133,  under IP 76.182.42.121,,, , ), www.dieselsmoke.com (,  under IP 64.12.117.10 and. www.nascarspace.com (, under IP 205.188.117.5 and here  under IP 76.182.42.121 and www.nitrousdirect.com  . Thanks for your attention in this matter  Hu12 00:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

that would be 100% inccorect, that is fine if you want to blame someone else but this pertains to your nazi editing of any page from communications, to phone cards to nascar to anything you happen to come across. You edit like a tornado and we don't like it. We will continue to reverse ANY EDIT you make untill you calm down and resolve your issues like an intelligent adult.

please sign your comments. Call it what you will, linkspam is linkspam and it will be removed, keep up vandalizing wikipedia and you won't be editing anything. Add content to the encyclopedia instead of trying to use it to advertise your sites. Hu12 00:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 16th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you [[Image:WikiThanks.png]]
I want to thank you so much for your kind words, my life's been pretty hectic the last few weeks, and you've really lifted me up. You do great work around here, also and I hope you feel it is appreciated. Hope to see you around more often! -- Will Mak  050389  01:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

--08toi 03:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Thank you for unblocking me!

User:Airbornecasualty etc
Is your account compromised... that's a very very weird block of a GF editor - the block summary "idiot" does not seem to be you....... -- Tawker 05:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Per se (phrase)
Why did you delete Per se (phrase)? It was de-prodded and then re-prodded which is a no-no. Then I changed it to an AFD five minutes ago. Before I could finish the AFD process, you deleted it... —Wknight94 (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Gee, thanks for the benefit of the doubt... // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Have your say ) 15:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Do admins not generally follow that part of the process? I've found three like that just today so far and I noticed you deleted around 50 articles in seven minutes.  If everyone else is simply machine-gunning through prod categories on a regular basis, then maybe I should be too?  —Wknight94 (talk) 16:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Got him!
I clobbered that clown that just gave you such grief. My pleasure. - Lucky 6.9 01:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Sweet! Thanks. // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Have your say ) 00:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

It's slow, and intermittent, but it's a proxy; I've indef'ed. Thought you'd like to know. :) <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk (u|t|c) </tt> 23:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Likewise! // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Have your say ) 00:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Turdsf
User talk:Turdsf: I guess you don't give people who threaten murder a second chance, huh?

Hell no. // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Have your say ) 22:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Advice
Hello Pilotguy, I noticed you warned User:81.154.252.34 about removing warnings. I've been kind of in an edit war with this user. I've asked him multiple times to discuss his changes, but he always just reverts. In Major religious groups he continually goes against the verifiable source, and removes the Aymaddias from the Muslim group, even though they self-identify as Muslim and included by the source. He's also been in revert wars with other editors in Islam in China, and he's used terminology that is against the Manual of Style (Islam-related articles) in Islamic view of miracles. I've given up reverting him there, because he doesn't listen to valid arguments. He's been blocked multiple times for 3RRs in those pages. Do you have any suggestions? Regards, -- Jeff3000 02:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 30th.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

E-mail
If you didn't see I poted on my talk and I sent an e-mail. Please respond at your earliest convenience. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 18:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Did you type this????
User talk:70.246.220.246 From Dr. Ip

Please respond on OK U

Type what? // <font color="#000000">Pilotguy (<font color="#0000FF">Cleared to land ) 23:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)