User talk:Pimpcbunb345

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Proud Boys, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stephen Miller (political advisor), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Stephen Miller (political advisor), will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please take why you think that part of the article should be removed to the talk page NZ Footballs Conscience  (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Miller (political advisor). ''Please take it too the talk page instead of removing the source content. You may not like it, but Wikipedia isn't about that, it is about if the content is sourced or not.'' NZ Footballs Conscience  (talk) 01:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 03:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ,, you'll note that your recent IP's edits look remarkably similar, and you both know that I have a very specific set of skills. , if you're wondering why this block seems to come out of the blue, look at the recent article history. In short, Pimpcbunb, you are blocked indefinitely because your only purpose on Wikipedia seems to be to push your own point of view, from this account and from an IP. And may I add--if you use the same edit summary a dozen times, please check your grammar. Our president's administration favors proper English. So, "The sources used are left bias and is a very subjective claim" is a no-no: "The sources used are left biased and the statement is a very subjective claim", at the very least. Drmies (talk) 03:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)