User talk:Pinaki1001

Speedy deletion nomination of Simplilearn


A tag has been placed on Simplilearn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Brianhe (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, Pinaki1001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 07:43, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising only account, likely violation of WP:PAID. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello Spiff , I have noticed that I have been blocked from any further contributions. I understand that you have blocked me for some sock puppetry portrayed by User:Aanchel B, to be honest there is nothing that I have done on this context. User:Aanchel B belongs to a 3rd party agency who was apparently told to relook into the article which was deleted earlier without my attention. I have specifically asked the user to stop all the activities and assure this will not happen in future. While I am carefully working on consolidating references to reinstate the earlier article on Ananth Narayanan, i strongly have no intent whatsoever to be a puppetier, or a proxy.

Pinaki1001 (talk) 10:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Moreover Spiff  you cannot simply go on blocking people. Instead why dont you help me and guide me correct things? If you say i CANNOT contribute anything for a person under which i work for just let me know clearly and I shall abide by it. But blocking without any warning is simply not done. Hope to get a positive consideration here. Pinaki1001 (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * You were warned, yet, you and your contractors have continued to use Wikipedia like your marketing brochures and resume repositories. I'm not going to reconsider my block as the amount of trouble you and your socks have caused is just wasting productive volunteer editor time. You can go try your marketing/advertising activities elsewhere. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Spaceman I dont know when was I warned. Moreover, they are not contracted by me. As an individual I did not have any hands over this. Using the word socks will be absolutely inappropriate as I have stated above. Once I came to know about this I already informed them to STOP all these. I can assure you, there wont be any further TROUBLE or wastage of productive volunteer time henceforth. If you have little bit of trust on my last sentence, allow me to exhibit the same (by completely ceasing any further contributions regarding the subject). I earnestly request to kindly reinstate my account.

Pinaki1001 (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no faith or trust and I will not consider an unblock now. You can try the standard offer.&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Spiff I've read the the standard offer. I am willing to wait (with no contributions ofcourse for the next 6 months). Will get in touch with you post that if you feel I could be given a chance then. Thanks for taking out time for the explanations above. Cheers!

Pinaki1001 (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Spiff. It's been almost 5 months now. Would you be willing to revoke the ban now ? I promise I will not involve in any misuse and follow the guildelines diligently. It's a humble request :)

Pinaki1001 (talk) 09:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)