User talk:Pinas2020

June 2011
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Pilipinas Win Na Win. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 07:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome and Join
Hi Pinas2020, you added interesting edit in Talk:Jehovah's_Witnesses. Your kind request: I want to edit some articles in Jehovah's Witnesses could be fulfilled. You can join to WikiProject concerning Jehovah's Witnesses related topics. our WikiProject

Just sign your name to this page

Happy editing! You´re welcome!

You could also use this userbox in your user page

--Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at 1DOL, you may be blocked from editing. -WayKurat (talk) 13:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  04:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gwendoline Ruais concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gwendoline Ruais, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gwendoline Ruais concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gwendoline Ruais, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gwendoline Ruais


Hello Pinas2020. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gwendoline Ruais".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)