User talk:Pineapplechunks

Your edits to Fauzi Bowo are being reverted because a) they are not sourced b) they are controversial and, if you would take the trouble to read WP:BLP you would understand that you need to exercise caution when editing the biography of a living person. Further, the language you use is from a point of view (e.g. " inhumanely"), and should be neutral. until you can meet wikipedia standards, your additons will ALWAYS be removed. So. It's up to you. Understand and join us. Don't understand, fight and lose, because there are more of us than you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

You comment smacks of arrogance and intimidation. Who are you to decide which "sources" are acceptable and what is controversial and what is not? How can such an approach as yours arrive at the truth?? Take out "inhumanely" if you wish, but the rest is 100% correct and should stand.


 * Hi there Pineapplechunks. I have reverted your edits to Fauzi Bowo again as they are controversial and unsourced. To answer your question above about which sources are acceptable, can I suggest you take a look at WP:VERIFY and WP:SOURCE, especially the comment that the important thing is verifiability, not truth. You may well be right about Fauzi Bowo's actions, but you need to demonstrate that somebody else wrote about them, or at a pinch, made these allegations. Regards Davidelit 03:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)