User talk:Pinedoa93/Delta–Mendota Canal

Alex- I hope this peer review helps! 1.	I think what you have in the article so far is very interesting. I thought your section on subsidence and how it’s affected the canal was especially interesting. I think you have the neutral content and the sources you have seem reliable. Your structure is also clear and balanced.

2.	I think you should define intertie more specifically. You also should proofread for grammar, you have completely written where I think you meant completed. Your first sentence should be broken into two sentences; it’s a little awkward. I think you should also define recirculation strategies- I’m a little confused about what that project will do.

3.	I think the most important thing you can do, other than expanding your article to cover more content, is add more citations. You only have 2 sources, and no citations in the first section at all! In adding more content, I think maybe you should find another facet of the canal to look at? Also, make sure your history adds to the history section that’s already in the article you’re editing. You could probably also add citations to the original article if you need more to do.

4.	I think we both need to work on adding more content.

GoldenLaurel (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)