User talk:Pingpong123q

Welcome!
Hello, Pingpong123q, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Publisher Casini, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mkdw talk 22:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Publisher Casini


A tag has been placed on Publisher Casini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mkdw talk 22:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List code php


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List code php requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 00:35, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Browser.php


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Browser.php requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 00:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Browser.php. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. - MrX 00:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giacomello


A tag has been placed on Giacomello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Casini, Gatti, Rossi (surname), Bossi, Sebastiani, and Simoncelli
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your edits, but please do not add in names to the above or any other disambiguation lists unless there are existing articles for the people you are adding. The inclusion of non-existing entries in disambiguation lists goes against Wikipedia's Manual of Style for Disambiguation pages. Your bolding of entries is also against the Manual of Style. You can add in links to any new articles that you create. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natalino Gatti


A tag has been placed on Natalino Gatti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sesamevoila (talk) 08:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgio Lo Russo


A tag has been placed on Giorgio Lo Russo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 16:05, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Birchard Austin Hayez
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Birchard Austin Hayez, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.rbhayes.org/hayes/mssfind/274/hayesbirch2.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Altervista (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Banzai


 * Baldini & Castoldi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Einaudi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Colombo (city)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Colombo (city) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. – TC N7  JM  22:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Colombo (city). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Mkdw talk 23:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Lorenzo Sebastiani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lorenzo Sebastiani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Sebastiani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw talk 23:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo, you may be blocked from editing. Mkdw talk 23:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Please, stop
It seems you are trying to contribute to Wikipedia but have not read through some of the basic principals and rules of the website. If you require help, please ask at the help desk. In particular, I have noticed you have created a number of articles that have been speedily deleted. There are numerous reasons for this, but most importantly it seems that the subjects or people lack WP:NOTABILITY. Regarding your edits at Colombo. The city is by far the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and should not be a disambiguation page. Furthermore, listing red links in a disambiguation page, and in the numbers you have been, suggest that these things are not worth mentioned, especially if most of them are red links. Lastly, I suggest you read WP:DISAMBIGUATION to see how to properly format and create a disambiguation page, and where it is appropriate to have one. Colombo (disambiguation) already exists for example. Also, you've changed some cited numbers in other city articles, please refrain from doing so. It has been a lot of work for a few volunteers to fix some of these problems so stopping, taking time to read through the policies, and then finding a constructive way to contribute would be greatly appreciated. Mkdw talk 23:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mkdw talk 23:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mkdw. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Baldini because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mkdw talk 23:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Casini, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mkdw talk 23:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - TP 00:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Baldini & Castoldi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldini & Castoldi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Baldini & Castoldi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mkdw talk 00:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)