User talk:Pini00001

Israel
Hi, thanks for your contribution to Israel. Please remember to include references for added material. Your sentence on yeridah is factually correct, of course - but this page can get contentious, and a good source for new material helps keep conflict to a minimum. cheers, Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jo-Ann Mort
A tag has been placed on Jo-Ann Mort requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 21:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Citations on Yerida (and other article)
Hello Pini! Glad to know that you are trying to improve your editing on Wikipedia. Here are the reasons I said that the citations were a bloody mess:

1. They were regular-sized - usually small-sized citations are accepted on Wikipedia, using the Reflist template - I have already fixed this.

2. There are too many spaces in the refs themselves - while this is not visible to the reader, it is a nightmare for the editor. Usually, the citations are either completely spaceless, like:
 * - or vertically structured (more organized, but makes it harder to read the actual text or the article for editors) -
 * - or vertically structured (more organized, but makes it harder to read the actual text or the article for editors) -

3. Naming and consolidating refs - it's good when references have a name, because then they can be used again on the page. For example:
 * Later, it can be used, like:
 * Later, it can be used, like:

4. Try to use specific templates for citations, instead of the citation template (this is of course not required).

5. Avoid entirely fields which aren't necessary. Don't know the date of the article? Don't put "date =". Is the format html (default)? Don't put "format =". Is English the language of the article? Don't put a language field, etc.

6. Avoid using authorlink/author-link. This is only for notable authors who have an article on Wikipedia. Most authors on regular news sources (Ynet, BBC, etc.) are non-notable and will never have articles, so it's pointless to link them.

7. While it's a matter of preference, I think it's better to use the author field instead of the first/last fields. While the latter is more modular and clearer to the system, it really makes no difference and only clutters the page with more fields.

8. Dates in refs must always be formatted yyyy-mm-dd, without a link. They will be linked automatically.

I hope these helped!

Cheers,

Ynhockey (Talk) 08:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique [ approves | this | message  ] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Beverly Hills, California, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. please see edit summary Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakewood Township (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Beverly Hills, California
Hi. From what you told me on my talk page, you still can't use that. You can't take information from two sources (The number of Jewish people from your source and the population of Beverly Hills from the census bureau) and combine them to synthesize a new piece of information. (The % of Jewish population). That is WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. I am going to ask you to revert that, but you may be able to find a source for that at the listed reference for the census bureau. Thanks. Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)