User talk:Pink Distortion

re: January 2009
You accused me of vandalising the page of Jac Arama, this is untrue.

I have simply corrected the errors on the page.

I have known him for over 30 years, it was I who put his proper name, DOB the correct number of children he has including his latest boy born (andre) recently.

His nick name is Maggot, JacAttack is NOT his nick name it is a poker move he does. The previous reference to JacAttack was also faulty and if you read the article you will see it quoted his online user names. So I corrected this misinformation and kept the reference.

I could make further edits, for example he is no longer in the travel industry but imports shoes, but what is the point if all you do is accuse one of vandalism.

It makes one not want to bother with Wikipedia at all and backs up the recent articles in PC Pro that suggest the editors are on some kind of power trip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.47.215 (talk • contribs) 09:56, 22 January 2009

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - February 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - March 2009
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - April 2009
{| width=100%
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid red; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: transparent;"|
 * valign=top style="border:1px solid red; -moz-border-radius: 10px; background-color: transparent;"|

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

sup noob
I've had this ip all day and I havn't been on wikipedia. Next time, check if its a dynamic ip and certainly dont bother if its a day old, probably less.86.139.47.215 (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * She doesn't log in much anymore, so I'll give a reply.
 * 86.139.47.215 made the offending edit at 17:08, 2009 January 19
 * Pink Distortion gave the warning at 17:09, 2009 January 19
 * 86.139.47.215 replied at 09:56, 2009 January 22
 * Pink Distortion replied at 13:28, 2009 January 22
 * Since the IP was used by the same person 3 days after the initial edit, I fail to see why it would be bad to assume that the IP was static. Plus, the reply was not "days old". The latest she replied was 3 and a half hours after, hardly "days old". Also, if the message wasn't intended for you, ignore it. I mean, that happened 4 months ago. If she did something wrong here, then I guess that I must be a "noob" as well. Apparition11  Complaints / Mistakes  01:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)