User talk:Pink Evolution~enwiki

=WELCOME TO MY USER TALK=

Would you mind stop adding the German name in the Brussels infobox? German is indeed one of the official languages of Belgium, therefore, the German name is mentioned in the first line of the article. However, in the infobox, it is common practice to only list the official languages of the locality itself. Which German is not. --Hooiwind (talk) 09:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ka-Ching!
Hi, you keep undoing my edits which revert your bolding of the number one position of the song in the chart section. Number one can not be bolded, see WP:CHARTS. Thankyoubaby (talk) 19:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I corrected it. Thank you for information. Pink Evolution (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And please stop to vandalise now... Pink Evolution (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a million =)
Cheers :) -- slakr \ talk / 19:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * :) Pink Evolution (talk) 19:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

warnings
Here you got http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Multi_level_templatesBlueduck silverduck (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

i don´t know if you alreday know this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesBlueduck silverduck (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Second link I knew, but the other not. Thanks a lot, Pink Evolution (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: "Level 1 Warning"
Hello, I have given a detailed reply to your question on my talk page. Camaron | Chris (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia: Record charts
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit at the above page. Your previous edit indicated that you only though "charts" was the intended wording, and I changed to the absolute intended wording...that is...peak positions should not be boldfaced (aka, 1), which was a problem in the past. It is this bolding that is against POV. Bolding would make that figure appear more important than others (yes, this is a weird technical issue, but one that was raised several times, so this clause was included to stem the tide). Unless you can provide a reason why the wording should be the other way around, I'll change back to "peak positions" tonight or tomorrow. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 13:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not change a guideline without discussion first
In response to this, I see that you changed the wording in this guideline again. This is part of WP:MoS and should not be changed without consensus. Thanks. - eo (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! —C.Fred (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not to mention that calling them an idiot is a personal attack. Please refrain from this behavior. Tan  |  39  18:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!
Also, I replied on my talk and the talk for the wiki page regarding our conversation. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Verifiability
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Onceloose (talk) 21:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about this warning template above, he has no grounds. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 22:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, don't bother posting or replying to him anymore. I am working on a solution, so don't waste your time because he will not give up, I know editors like him. Just let everything work itself out. The truth will come out soon. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Pink Evolution. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Pink Evolution~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)