User talk:Pinkflo9

Marital rape article, sourcing, etc.
Pinkflo9, I stated with this edit, while removing material you added, "I'm tempted to revert a lot of the recent additions, per citation style, WP:Due weight, WP:Editorializing and essay concerns. Removed Types section because of its WP:Due weight violation."

In the case of sourcing, see WP:Citation style. You are using parenthetical referencing (Citing sources), which is accepted, but I really think you should stick to the  style since that is more convenient for readers and is common here at Wikipedia. In the case of WP:Due weight, a whole section on what one or a few researchers argue about types is undue weight in this case. For what I mean about editorializing, see WP:Editorializing. Pieces of your additions also have an essay-like feel; so you should work on making the sure that your wording is more encyclopedic. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)