User talk:Pinksugar77

January 2017
Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Margot Frank, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 21:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Margot Frank, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bela Lugosi, you may be blocked from editing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Bela Lugosi. ''Please stop. '' ɯ ɐ ɔ  💬 01:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Justeditingtoday (talk) 22:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amy Winehouse has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amy Winehouse was changed by Pinksugar77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912345 on 2017-01-16T00:18:57+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Margot Frank. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Margot Frank was changed by Pinksugar77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871401 on 2017-01-16T00:38:19+00:00.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Anne Frank. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amy Winehouse, you may be blocked from editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Malcolm X. Exemplo347 (talk) 11:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 18:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Making changes against consensus and continuing to do so after being blocked and warned, without seeking to communicate with other editors, is a clear case of disruption. You can consider asking to be unblocked, and when you do so it would be good if you show that you know that you understand what a collaborative project is. Drmies (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)