User talk:PinkyFloyd

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello PinkyFloyd! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 3 of the articles that you created  are currently tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Raymond W. Copp -
 * 2) Irl A. Gladfelter -
 * 3) Tan Binh Phan Nguyen -

Nomination of Raymond W. Copp for deletion
The article Raymond W. Copp is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raymond W. Copp until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lear's Fool 12:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Irl A. Gladfelter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irl A. Gladfelter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Irl A. Gladfelter& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 12:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Augustana Catholic Church has been nominated for deletion
Category:Augustana Catholic Church has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

"Raymond W. Copp" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Raymond_W._Copp&redirect=no Raymond W. Copp] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

"Irl A. Gladfelter" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Irl_A._Gladfelter&redirect=no Irl A. Gladfelter] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Raymond W. Copp for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond W. Copp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raymond W. Copp& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Veverve (talk) 07:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)