User talk:Pinkypop374

Speedy deletion of Niffler
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Niffler, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 12:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 12:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Blast-Ended Skrewt
A tag has been placed on Blast-Ended Skrewt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 12:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The above two speedy deletion notices
Hi. I just want to say that because I do not read Harry Potter, there was no way I could have known that the articles referred to in the two notices above were from that series. The way these articles were written led to believe these creatures were made-up hoaxes. Please do provide sufficient context to avoid future misunderstandings of the same kind. Thank you. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 12:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Niffler
I've declined the speedy deletion of this as it is clearly about a fictional character from Harry Potter. However, for the article to survive, it will need verifiable sources (see WP:V) and it should show real world significance. That is to say, the subject must have a provenance outside of Harry Potter. Let me know if you need help, or go to the Help desk. The welcome below contains links to help you edit. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim'''  13:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

==Welcome++

Speedy deletion of "Sarah Magill"
A page you created, Sarah Magill, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. StaticGull Talk  12:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -- Bedford Pray  17:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jessiecave.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jessiecave.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW ( Talk ) 00:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please do not vandalize pages on Wikipedia. Your content edit does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 19:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Condover Primary School


The article Condover Primary School has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article fails and is likely to continue to fail the WP:GNG and WP:ORG guidelines on notability. The article is not covered by the accepted practice of WP:NHS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Condover Primary School for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Condover Primary School, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Condover Primary School until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fæ (talk) 01:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)