User talk:Piobuilleann

January 2017
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

FYI, if you're trying to use Wikipedia to compete in a SEO challenge, you are wasting your time - Wikipedia tags all external links with nofollow. - MrOllie (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Search engine optimization. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Please see this. When an editor reverts your edit you go to the article's talk page and try to obtain a consensus in favour of your change - and this applies even more when two (and now three) different editors revert the same edit. You can also post to this noticeboard if you wish to argue in favour of your blog being a reliable source. --bonadea contributions talk 06:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)