User talk:Pipjohn

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Pollen House (March 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Pollen House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Henry_Pollen_House Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Henry_Pollen_House reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Henry Pollen House has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henry Pollen House. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Pollen House has been accepted
 Henry Pollen House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! /wiae  /tlk  14:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Henry_Pollen_House help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Copyright
You can't just help yourself to photos that you find on the internet. In simple terms, before you can use photos on Wikipedia (or Wikimedia Commons), they need to be either rather old (where copyright has expired), or the photo needs to have been explicitly published with a suitable license. St. David's Memorial Church, Cave doesn't meet those requirements, and I've put it up for deletion. Photos is a tricky area; feel free to ask for help / advice when you are looking for something. And don't be dispirited, but keep those architectural articles coming!  Schwede 66  09:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message and concern. I am however aware of the issue you have bought to my attention. I wrote to the author of the photos. I asked for permission to use the photos and to add them to Wikipedia Commons on a CC license. He agreed to both. How should label uploads like these ones in the future to avoid this confusion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipjohn (talk • contribs) 12:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah; very good. In that case, please read and follow the instructions at Open-source Ticket Request System (OTRS). And it makes more sense to keep discussions in one place, hence I've moved your message from my talk page to here. You can use the template  to notify me (or any other user) when you respond.  Schwede  66  19:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Brilliant. Thanks once again for all your help. I have sent the appropriate email to the permission's team and added  to the files. Hopefully it all works out and I can use the photos soon.   Pipjohn 15:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Antigua Boat Sheds
Nice to see that there's finally an English entry for this marvel; the German WP has had an article for years! Just had an edit conflict and I see that you've only just created it, and are obviously still editing. Let me know when you are done, please.  Schwede 66  19:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message. I have finished for now.. i think. I looked over the German WP and realised I had made a few mistakes. If the conflict still exist I would love your help. I found writing the sentence about it being "the only boat shed situated on a river..". rather clunky and difficult. Any help would be great. Pipjohn 20:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry scrap that I am still editing. My last edit did not save. Apologies. Pipjohn 20:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok finished now. Sorry about the mix up. Pipjohn 20:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Old Government Building, Christchurch
Nice one! Don't want to cause an edit conflict - you might want to use NZ English (centralise) and it's Cat I (infobox shows II). Do you know whether Dave Henderson still lives in one of the penthouses?  Schwede 66  18:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help and finding the errors! An article from The Press from four days ago seems to indicate that he still lives in the penthouse. Pipjohn 14:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hi Pipjohn, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  05:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * That said, here’s one note of caution. I'm sure that there would be consensus that Category I comes with inherent notability, whereas the same won’t be true for Category II. Therefore, I suggest that you make sure that Cat II articles clearly show that WP:GNG is met. Getting hold of a couple of substantial newspaper articles would certainly help. There would definitely be lots about the Curator’s House on PapersPast, e.g. when it was under construction. Best to get on top of that before somebody challenges you with a PROD or AfD.  Schwede 66  01:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks . I have added a PapersPast article. In addition to that I added the CCC heritage listing as it shows that the Curator's house is a significant building for Chch. Especially as it is still standing post the earthquakes. Pipjohn 7:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:NZIA Gold Medal-winning buildings has been nominated for listification
Category:NZIA Gold Medal-winning buildings has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 18:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)