User talk:Pippie Langkous

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 02:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

it was my intention to take this non relevant information of the page about Sheldon. The page about Sheldon, Derbyshire should focus about the village and cultural aspects in general. By focusing specific on a particular issue it gives the impression, wrong or right, to readers that this text is added out of personal, biased issues, which are definately not suitable and out of order at a page titled"Sheldon, Derbyshire". Herbey i ask politly the person or persons who find it necesary to post this kind of information to do it on relevant sites on the internet.Pippie Langkous (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Please understand that you cannot simply delete entire sections of sourced material from articles without having consensus to do so. By blanking the lower half of the article you are also removing the category links and the entire reference section. Please go to the talk page and lay out your argument as to why you believe the material should be removed and, if consensus is that the material should be moved, then the article can be edited in such a fashion that the categories and such are maintained. Do not keep blanking the page as you and your corresponding IP address have done as it will be reverted. Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 14:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

t was my intention to take this non relevant information of the page about Sheldon. The page about Sheldon, Derbyshire should focus about the village and cultural aspects in general. By focusing specific on a particular issue it gives the impression, wrong or right, to readers that this text is added out of personal, biased issues, which are definately not suitable and out of order at a page titled"Sheldon, Derbyshire". Herbey i ask politly the person or persons who find it necesary to post this kind of information to do it on relevant sites on the internet.Pippie Langkous (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC) So hopefully you understand, as a citizin from Sheldon, i would like to have more relevant information on the wikipedia than a for me incomprehensible feud which seems to be going on here.
 * Wikipedia is not a travel brochure, you cannot simply remove referenced material because you don't agree with it. I will be bringing this discussion to the appropriate noticeboard so that additional people can decide what part of the info to keep. Please DO NOT remove the sourced material again until concensus is reached on the talk page of the article (not here). --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 22:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Pippi, since you won't engage in discussion on the article talk page in order to gain concensus for the change, I've asked for additional assistance at the content noticeboard here. Please do not make any further changes to the article until other editors can weigh in with their opinion. This doesn't mean that the information you want removed will be left in the article, it just means that if people agree that it should be removed it's done properly without the reference section and categories being deleted as well. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 23:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC

) The added link "official website of the Sheldon Parish meeting" i propose to take it of for the moment as it doesnt seem to work properly and needs to have a necessary update. As i dont want to offend anybody here i ask a third opion to take this link off until it has undergone an update .At the moment it is strangly enough only refering to the subject of the controversy section and that doesnt seem to be the essence of the general website of the Sheldon Parish meeting.Please i ask a third opion about the mentioned website and advice to take it off the page.(pippie 17:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC))

This is your only warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Sandstein  18:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC) For context see also User talk:Sandstein.  Sandstein  18:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop.
From your contributions, it is apparent that you are only here to pursue some sort of dispute that you have with persons living in Sheldon, Derbyshire. This is an abuse of Wikipedia, which is an encyclopedia and not a battlefield for pursuing real-world disputes. Unless you convince us that you can make contributions (preferably about some other subject) that comply with WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:V WP:BLP and other core principles of Wikipedia, you will be blocked indefinitely from contributing to Wikipedia.  Sandstein  20:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 22:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Sheldon, Derbyshire, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Fisher Queen can you please inform me why a twitter page from a resident would not be accepted as an add and a twitter page (written by a citizen as well and clearly airing biased info) is accepted. Please dont think i try to annoy here or scoring points, but as you probably understand this page is being used by giving one sided info. Could you advise me how to change the twitter heading to make it possible to add it on this page. Thank you>(pippie 16:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC))
 * Changing the sentence from neutral wording to 'enhance' and 'improve' is another violation of the neutral point of view policy. Twitter is not a reliable, published source.  Those are both policies that I have personally drawn your attention to before, and I believe that other users have, also.  I stumbled upon your edits while patrolling recent changes, and since I added Sheldon, Derbyshire to my watchlist, most of the edits that I have seen from you have reflected a failure to understand the neutral point of view policy.  We are happy to have your neutrally phrased, sourced edits, but if that's not the kind of editing you want to do, I will sadly have to block you from editing until such a time as you more fully understand those rules. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)