User talk:Piquedram

Welcome!
Hello, Piquedram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 13:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to June 25, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears that you are ignoring the warning above about marking edits as minor. Continuing to incorrectly mark edits as minor as you have done on February 23 will be considered disruptive and may result in a block from editing.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 10:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies. Apparently, the interpretation of 'minor' is different here than on the Dutch wikipedia. Over there, all my edits are set to minor by default. I undo vandalism, do some tiny fixes here and there and also add the names of people under Birth/Death if they're missing. These are, in my view, minor edits as they do not imply enormous changes in the article either lay-out wise or content-wise. Not marking them as minor, in that case, would probably lead to a message from another user asking why I'm not marking small edits and additions like that as minor. And they ARE minor. I fear if I keep contributing to the English wikipedia I may, accidentally, continue marking these edits as minor because it's become such a habit. Maybe I should stop coming here in the future. Please keep in mind that it's not out of ill intent. Kind regards, || --Piquedram (talk) 10:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)