User talk:PirateSmackK/2009/Apr

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! — Ched : ?  18:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

RFA
Thank you for considering submittingyour RFA. While I applaud enthusiasm, I'm afraid you do not yet possess sufficient knowledge/experience for the community to have confidence in your readiness to become an admin. You may find the following advice helpful. If you have not done so already, please read
 * Guide to requests for adminship
 * WP:Admin
 * the admin reading list.
 * Generally, It has been my experience that it takes at least 3,000 edits in a variety of areas to learn policy and guidelines well enough to attempt adminship. Also, nominees returning after an unsuccessful RfA should wait at least another 3,000 edits and 3 months before trying again. Nominees need to show the ability to contribute a number of significant edits to build the encyclopedia.
 * The Admin tools allow the user to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect  and unprotect  pages. Nominees will therefore do well to gain experience and familiarity with such areas as WP:AIV, WP:AFD, WP:CSD, Protection policy, and WP:BLOCK to learn when to do these things.
 * Adminship inevitably leads one to 1) need to explain clearly the reasons for one's decisions, 2) need to review one's decisions and change one's mind when it is reasonable to do so, 3) need to review one's decisions and stand firm when it is reasonable to do so, 4) need to negotiate a compromise. Admins need a familiarity with dispute resolution. The ability to communicate clearly is essential.
 * Article building is the raison d'être of Wikipedia. I recommend significant participation in WP:GA or WP:FA as the surest way to gain article building experience. Alternatively, one should have added a total of 30,000 bytes of content, not necessarily all in one article. I find a large number of "Wikignome" type edits to be helpful.
 * My suggestion would be to consider trying in another 3 months and 3000 edits. I recommend taking part in RfA discussions to help learn from the experiences of others. Many nominees have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review or to receive Admin coaching before submitting their RfA. Hope this helps. Good luck and happy editing.  Dloh  cierekim  18:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of My talk page
A tag has been placed on My talk page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cunard (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aids navigating around the site.. PirateSmackK (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

PirateSmackK
Please do not create redirects from article space into your user space, as you did with PirateSmackK. Such redirects are speedy deleted under criteria R2 of CSD.

If you wish to be admin some day, you would do well to read that page and remember not to create content that satisfies the above-listed criteria. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Aids navigation. PirateSmackK (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of My talk page
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The cross-namespace redirect has been removed per criterion R2 for speedy deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think its useful- registered users have a link to their talk page at the top, but IPs don't. If the redirect is created they can type in "My talk page" in search and go straight to their talk page. PirateSmackK (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It's not needed. If they get a new message, they'll get the message at the top of the screen that they have a new message on their talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh. Then maybe I should redirect My contributions to Special:MyContributions! -PirateSmackK (talk) 21:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Instant beach
Please don't delete speedy deletion tags, if you oppose the deletion, the proper response is to post a {hangon} tag on the article and explain on the talk page. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No, is for creator of the article, which I'm not. Read the speedy template "If you think this tag has been placed in error or you intend to improve the article, remove this notice but do not remove the tag from articles that you created yourself". The instant beach article has nuff context to identify the subject, so its not A1. PirateSmackK (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:CSD - WP:MADEUP is not a criteria for speedy deletion PirateSmackK (talk) 05:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (archivenow!) PirateSmackK (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

(Context: بلوک7) If you add to a page, please list the page on WP:PNT as well. Regards, Kimchi.sg (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * OK will do that PirateSmackK (talk) 08:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you read arabic? I didn't realise it was advertisement PirateSmackK (talk) 08:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Searching a bit more, it seems to be a locality in Iran. Kimchi.sg (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (archivenow!) PirateSmackK (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Woooooho PirateSmackK (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks PirateSmackK (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (archivenow!) PirateSmackK (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback removed
Sorry, but I've removed your rollback rights, after seeing consistent inappropriate use of the tool (example). – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * And using Twinkle to "identify" good faith edits as vandalism is fine.. PirateSmackK (talk) 13:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I never said it was, did I? :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No :-p
 * But long time users usually get away with their wrongdoings. Had I used Twinkle to do what Mayllad did my monobook.js would've been blanked and protected.
 * Anyway I understand why you removed my rollback :( will have to get on without it PirateSmackK (talk) 13:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

(archivenow!)

Meta
What is meta? PirateSmackK (talk) 22:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Meta is a central wiki-based site that coordinates all Wikimedia Foundation projects. See WP:META.  Chzz  ►  22:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Modified Huggle
The change is so small that I think you will be disappointed :P. I did the same thing with AutoWikiBrowser and NPWatcher. I just downloaded Huggle from SVN and loaded it into Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2008 (freely available). I started it using F5. It comes with the error message. Stop the execution. You can then search using "find in files" for the error string. When you find it it's just the definition of a constant. You can now search for uses of that constant. I found the rollback check and I commented out the line that shows the error message and quits. It actually a one character edit :P (comments in VB are just "'"). NPWatcher has a weird function where you can just return prematurely with a "registered" value. The modified Huggle can be found here:. The change is in Requests/ConfigRequests.vb line 147: Fail(Msg("login-error-rollback")). You just have to comment it out. --Ysangkok (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)