User talk:Piscesnikki

=Tom Hardy and Charlotte Riley= On the article for Tom Hardy you claimed: "It was while working on Wuthering Heights that he met his current partner, actress Charlotte Riley. The two began a relationship shortly after finishing work on The Take." (Grammar of your addition polished by myself but no change in meaning, I've double-checked).

On the article Charlotte Riley you have the opposite: "Whilst working on The Take Charlotte met actor Tom Hardy. She later began a relationship with him after they starred together in ITV1s Wuthering Heights."

Which is it? One of these versions is wrong, but since you've provided no citation I can't tell which needs correction. (The air dates of these shows are so close I daren't guess which production occurred first.) Thanks in advance for your attention. JohnFromPinckney (talk) 23:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Mary I
Hello! Do you have any references to back up this edit? Surtsicna (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Isobel Malt


A tag has been placed on Isobel Malt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Josh Parris 01:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Piscesnikki! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ruta Gedmintas -

The Tudors
I've reverted your bit about in The Tudors article because it is non-notable trivia, and unsourced. You've added this info multiple times before, please make this your last. I appreciate your obvious expansive knowledge of the era, but see that you've made similar edits that would be considered trivial to other articles as well. Wikipedia is not meant to contain lists of every historical discrepancy in a TV series, or every divergent fact related to a topic. You will note that the bulk of the "departures from history" in the Tudors article are more significant, like the combination of Henry's sisters into one character: this one was actually notable enough to be mentioned in an outside source, and technically that is the threshold of what is notable. All facts should actually be referenced with a source, and I'm guessing that with your knowledge you have access to or know how to find such sources. It would be a great help to Wikipedia if you could cite some of these. Thanks.&mdash; TAnthonyTalk 05:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)