User talk:Piscili

Nomination of Marco Canolintas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Canolintas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marco Canolintas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TAXIDICAE💰 17:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Marco Canolinntas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Canolinntas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marco Canolinntas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PK650 (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Regarding my edits to William Crain (filmmaker)
Can you check my edits more closely? I removed the link to the site of unrelated filmmaker Rob Crain and tagged the article as needing any verifiable sources; I then decided to return and add three sources to verify the biography of a living person. 73.37.211.177 (talk) 06:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Someone else reinstated my edits. This is the third time I've been erroneously warned in the past two months: in both cases, a human checked Recent Changes with RedWarn or SWViewer and trusted the tool understood good from bad. You have to be careful with semi-automated or automated tools, they can mislead you into thinking they replace human evaluation—but they just flag edits for review based on simple criteria. 73.37.211.177 (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your revert to WHS
Hi, I noticed you reverted an IP user's edit to Westfield High School (New Jersey). The IP edit seemed constructive as it seemed to fix a grammatical error. I wanted to let you know that I restored the IP editor's version, but if you believe this was incorrect, I'd like to hear from you. Thanks, Neuropol  Talk  13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, the IP removed content from the page without explaining why in their first edit and in the second edit introduced new content that has grammatical errors. I think that the edit that seemed right is the last edit which also tried to correct some of the errors in the second edit. Please, review the edits. Thanks. Piscili (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The edit which you reverted was the edit which fixed the grammatical error. Thanks, Neuropol  Talk  13:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * please check this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Westfield_High_School_(New_Jersey)&diff=prev&oldid=1220542817 Piscili (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The revision you made was unrelated to this. | This was the edit you made. Thanks,  Neuropol  Talk  13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Hello ,

looking at Special:Diff/1226458668, I think you'll need to have a look at WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:BLPRESTORE. If you are unsure about how this applies to the edit, please ask.

Best regards, &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)