User talk:Pissant

Welcome!
Hi , and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: Mailer Diablo 17:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC). This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 17:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Shooting Range

 * Hi Pissant. As I mentioned on Talk:Shooting range, I can tell you about the four ranges near Harrodsburg, Kentucky.
 * At the Mercer County Fish & Game Club, I pay $35 a year and get a key. It's like a little farm or park.  I just show up, open the gate, and let myself in.  I had to sign something to acknowledge the rules.  It has a rifle and pistol range.  It has something for shotguns, archery, blackpowder and fishing, but I'm unfamiliar with  them.
 * At the Bluegrass Sportsman's League, you pay $100 a year with $100 initial setup. You get an electronic gate card and let yourself in.  They have very nice facilities that are more refined and extensive than the above.  It also has more people since it is closer to the larger city of Lexington.
 * Before it burned down, Bluegrass Indoor Range had a location inside Lexington. I think it was $8 per half-hour.  Membership was possible.  They rented Glocks and some Charter Arms guns.  They offered beginner's and CCW classes.
 * Bud's Gun Shop in Paris, KY (north of Lexington) has a small, simple indoor pistol range. I got a free use when I bought a Vaquero there.  I signed a waiver.  I don't know if they had memberships, or what they normally charge to use it.
 * This is Kentucky; the rules in Massachusetts or Toronto or Japan will vary significantly. Good Luck. -- Mike Wilson 01:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Have re-written the shooting range article to address your queries. Best regards.   12 January 2006 (UTC)

DYK heads-up
Hi, thanks for this heads-up. However, you'd get faster response if you try Talk:Main Page. --Gurubrahma 07:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Requests made at main page preceded request made at DYK. The anon's request sat unheeded at the main page for more than one hour. Pissant 17:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The Mirror (film)
I'm disappointed with your move of the great Tarkovsky film to a new page without prior consulting other, more experienced editors. Please don't do this again. The dab page you created contains nothing but red links. Although, take a look at this and try to fix it. As you may see, several dozen articles link to the Tarkovsky movie. Now, these links point to a wrong page: people searching for the Tarkovsky film are transported to a dab page and get confused. Take care, Ghirla | talk 14:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Please be patient, I am in the middle of quite a complicated operation. Pissant 14:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summmary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 1% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 18 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 05:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Image sizes I
OK, when you reset the picture sizes, they appeared smaller to me. What can we do? Yellowmellow45 21:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Image sizes II
Hi, please do not remove hard coded image sizes, it is perfectly acceptable to have images of different sizes on a page. Also, the standard thumb size is definitely not suitable for landscape photos. Arniep 10:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * My eyes are not good, so I prefer to see the images as large as possible. Hard-coded  small image sizes make it hard for me to see the images.  I assume hard-coded large image sizes are inconvenient for other people.  Wikipedia is viewed by people with different visual abilities, different monitors, and different browsers.  They will have a better experience of Wikipedia if they can adjust the image sizes to suit their situation, rather than using the image sizes that looked good to a particular editor on a particular monitor in a particular browser.


 * From Extended image syntax:
 * "... the default thumbnail width can be set in the preferences, so typically it is better not to specify "px", in order to respect the users' preferences (unless, for a special reason, a specific size is required regardless of preferences, or a size is specified outside the range of widths 120-300 that can be set in the preferences)."


 * Pissant 16:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Pissant, good call on changing the image size of Bevo (mascot) to the default. There was no real reason for that photo to deviate from the user's default. Keep up the great work! Johntex\talk 17:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Pissant 17:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Alternative name in category for sorting purposes
Hi, I'm restoring the change you made to IEEE_802.1ad because I'm assuming you didn't understand the purpose of the alternative name in the Category tag: means that the IEEE 802.1ad entry should be listed in the IEEE 802 category but sorted amongst the other entries as if it were named IEEE 802.01ad. I've made this mistake myself (deleted such things from entries thinking they were obviously wrong -- there is no such thing as IEEE 802.01ad) so I thought I'd share my experience. Mditto 06:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi
I agree with you on this fact that so called greater Iran does not deserve an independant article.  D iyako Talk + 17:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry; my edit summary was cryptic and you misunderstood. I was sarcastically talking about the word Xinjiang, which was bolded but not linked, as if somebody had thought that we would not have an article on Xinjiang.  In fact I knew nothing about Greater Iran before today.  Pissant 01:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Post-Panamax link
Hi, while your point is valid, and in line with WP:MOS-L, do you really think that someone is going to create a post-Panamax article one day? Or is this just an unnecessary use of a redirect page, which will place more load on Wikipedia's already-thrashing servers? After all, if someone does create a post-Panamax article, they will naturally search for all occurrences of "post-Panamax" (or post-Panamax ) and make them into links. Cheers, — Johan the Ghost seance 16:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for discussing and sorry for the delay in my response. While your points are also valid, and I can see going either way, I tend toward the choice I made because the redirect is useful to have anyway, I believe redirects are an effective and elegant tool and wish to encourage their acceptance, I imagine (with no evidence behind me) that redirects are a very minor load on the servers, and I believe you are overly optimistic about the actions of our hypothetical future article creator. Pissant 22:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Ant image
I've taken the liberty of replacing the ant on your user page to one from the commons, I did this because the licence was not compatible with user page use. Hope this is ok. --Alf melmac 18:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Excellent. Thank you.  Pissant 19:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Weight training exercises

 * Excellent idea: it looks a lot tidier now. Hmmm, I'm tempted to subcat category:weight training equipment too. What do you think? GeorgeStepanek\talk 21:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Let's do it. Pissant 21:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And it's done already. Wow. Thank you. GeorgeStepanek\talk 21:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Good catch on leg press. I was going too fast to notice that it covered both the exercise and the equipment. Pissant 21:58, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Santa Fe, Cuba dab
You removed the disambiguation template from the Santa Fe, Cuba page. There's a disscussion on the topic's talk page about that. Could you comment there as to why you consider that a dab is inappropriate? Thanks. Qyd (talk)18:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Stub template placement
Re: Gordon Eubanks, because stub identification is rendered on an article page prior to hardcoded items like categories and cross-Wiki links, they are usually placed at the end of the article proper, after External links if they exist, but not after cats or cross-Wiki links. ((WP:Stub only says "near the bottom", so I will clarify that point) --Blainster 19:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I had assumed that the convention was for stubs to appear after cats and before interwiki links after seeing several bot edits that put them there and because by my informal sample it is slightly more common. Placing stubs after cats also has the advantage that the stub categories will appear after the "real" categories.  I see that there is ongoing discussion at wikipedia talk:stub, so I will stop moving them until consensus is reached.
 * I was surprised to see that you responded to my following a different convention than the one that you prefer not merely by reverting my change, but also editing the Manual of Style to support your position. However, this is a wiki, and your action does bring the issue to a larger forum, in case there is anyone else who cares to weigh in.  Perhaps it might have been better for you to first bring the matter up on the MoS talk page?
 * Thanks for caring about quality. Pissant 00:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

My change to the Stub article was meant to be flagged by the last sentence in my message above. The change was not made with any intention of establishing a "rule", but only a guideline for new users who are confused about such things and need some direction. I explained this on the Stub talk page. Also, I am not on a campaign to change practices for pages that I do not frequently edit. It is just one preference, and WP tolerates some flexibility for these things. Best regards, --Blainster 21:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Max Beckmann
I noticed you removed the hardcoding, namely |right|300px| on Max Beckmann. I'm not disputing this, just interested in the reason, as I don't know a lot about the matter. Thanks. Tyrenius 15:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The right tag has no effect, as the the default placement is on the right. I prefer to remove it, as its presence might lead to the impression that left and right placement are equally good, while I hold that images should be on the right unless there is good reason to place them elsewhere.
 * I prefer to remove hardcoded image sizes as they override the user's preferences. Because of the diversity in users' visual abilities and viewing conditions, it seems better to let each choose his or her own image sizes.


 * This point is supported by Extended image syntax:
 * "... the default thumbnail width can be set in the preferences, so typically it is better not to specify "px", in order to respect the users' preferences (unless, for a special reason, a specific size is required regardless of preferences, or a size is specified outside the range of widths 120-300 that can be set in the preferences)."


 * Pissant 16:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Sizes III
Please do not remove hardcode pixel sizes from image in articles. If you need to look at images that are sized as thumbnails, you can click on the image and see the image at a 1:1 size on its own page. Removing the hard coded information makes the image too-small for the casual browser. Also, in other articles the sizes are stated because of layout considerations.

I have noted your reasoning for removing the coding, however the oft quoted recommendation is just that, a recommendation, not a hard and fast rule. Stude62 18:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Indeed, it is only a recommendation, and I have never disputed a reversion of my changes. However, I would prefer that images which go against the recommendation at least do so knowingly and for a reason, and I strongly suspect that the majority of the hard-coded image sizes in Wikipedia are there not in support of a carefully chosen layout, but because the editor did not realize that specifying an image size is optional and recommended against.


 * Perhaps the best solution, one we might both support, would be to press for a larger default size, although I have not yet identified the proper forum in which to do so. Pissant 18:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you might wish to start with the Village Pump. I should also advise you that as far as the automobile based articles are concerned, most all of them do have hard coded images. Stude62 19:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duzidengdai.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duzidengdai.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Golden Triangle (Cheshire)


The article Golden Triangle (Cheshire) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Passing mention, and an opinion at that, in one source, does not make this a notable term worthy of inclusion here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhull andemu  21:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pissant! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Morgan Wade -

AfD nomination of Linux For You
An article that you have been involved in editing, Linux For You, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Spotting (climbing) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spotting (climbing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spotting (climbing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  21:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Spotting (weight training) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spotting (weight training) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Spotting (weight training) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  21:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Lingdian for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lingdian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lingdian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 17:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Golden Triangle (Missouri)


A tag has been placed on Golden Triangle (Missouri) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

references

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HYeahMFr (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Golden Triangle (Missouri)


The article Golden Triangle (Missouri) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced since 2006. I can not find any sources to support this geographic area being notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- GB fan 23:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Goped


A tag has been placed on Goped, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 01:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Golden Triangle (Missouri) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golden Triangle (Missouri) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Golden Triangle (Missouri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- GB fan 15:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

"Motorscooterxxx" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Motorscooterxxx&redirect=no Motorscooterxxx] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)