User talk:Pitarobertz

Removal of maintenance tags
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Shajith Koyeri. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 16:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Shajith Koyeri dispute resolution
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Repeated removal of peacock template from Shajith Koyeri article". Thank you. --Total-MAdMaN (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. "madman is aggressively doing something. Why don't he try to improve with his own words then instead of his so called peacock. I think he gone real mad." Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * }


 * Hello, Pitarobertz. There have been several problems with your editing relating to Shajith Koyeri, and, as you have been informed, the matter has been raised at the dispute resolution noticeboard. I thought it might help to explain to you what the problems are, so that you can understand how to address those problems. First of all, you made substantial edits which were not written from a neutral point of view, as required by Wikipedia policy. Your edits were unambiguously designed to promote the subject, that is to say to tell us how wonderful he is, not to give a neutral, detached account. Secondly, you made statements which were not supported by any source. When these statements were removed, you restored them. Any statement which has been challenged or questioned, or which may be controversial, must be supported by reliable sources, and must not be restored without such sources. We do not accept content purely on the basis of the say so of someone who chooses to edit Wikipedia. thirdly, you have removed a maintenance template, calling attention to problems, from the article without addressing the issues it referred to. Such maintenance templates help to alert other editors to problems which they may be able to help with, and should not be removed until the issues have been resolved. Fourthly, when you find other editors disagree with your edits, it is not acceptable to simply keep repeating the same edits. Doing so, known as edit warring, can lead to being blocked from editing. Instead, explain the reasons for your editing on the article's talk page, and try to reach agreement. I am also giving you a welcome message, which contains links to various pages which may help you to understand how Wikipedia works. I suggest you have a look at the ones which seem most relevant. If you follow what they say, they should help to remove the risk of being blocked from editing, which might happen if you were to continue in the same way you have being doing so far. (I do hope that will not happen.) Also, please feel welcome to contact me on my talk page if you need more advice. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SwisterTwister   talk  04:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vishal O Sharma concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vishal O Sharma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vishal O Sharma


Hello Pitarobertz. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vishal O Sharma".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 7 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Sonali Raut page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=641420773 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F641420773%7CSonali Raut%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Page move
You have messed with the page. Reverting with moves is not as simple as reverting edits. Now an admin has to fix it, all the page history is lost. If you have an issue, there is talk page. The move to S. Kumar (cinematographer) was done because "ISC" (Indian Society of Cinematographers) is not part of his name. ISC is an organisation, the members of this society will show a suffix, ISC with their name in film credits. See the articles for other ISC member (Santosh Sivan, P. C. Sreeram etc).--Charles Turing (talk) 13:52, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S. Kumar (cinematographer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pattalam and Parinayam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:S. Kumar (cinematographer).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:S. Kumar (cinematographer).jpg, which you've attributed to S. KUMAR. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Savitha Nambrath.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Savitha Nambrath.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Savitha Nambrath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Savitha Nambrath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Savitha Nambrath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. US-Verified (talk) 10:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Savitha Nambrath


A tag has been placed on Savitha Nambrath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:1658:441A:68F1:B3FF:FE7A:B9B (talk) 11:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Use of multiple accounts
Hello, Pitarobertz, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1658:441A:68F1:B3FF:FE7A:B9B (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Savitha Nambrath. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1658:441A:68F1:B3FF:FE7A:B9B (talk) 12:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Savitha Nambrath, you may be blocked from editing. 2A00:23EE:1658:441A:68F1:B3FF:FE7A:B9B (talk) 12:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Savitha Nambrath. 2A00:23EE:1658:441A:68F1:B3FF:FE7A:B9B (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Pitarobertz. Thank you. — AP 499D25  (talk)  23:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Savitha Nambrath


A tag has been placed on Savitha Nambrath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914 (talk) 05:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:19C8:BA81:48C:2DFF:FEC5:9914 (talk) 12:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)