User talk:Pitchcurve

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

-- Yae4 (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

CopperheadOS
Hi Pitchcurve, I noticed that you made three reverts within the last hour over at CopperheadOS. If you haven't read it already, please take a look at the three-revert rule. I quote: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period." Violating this rule will usually result in being blocked from editing. I won't be doing any blocking myself, as I am pretty much involved with this particular issue now, but I can't say how other administrators will view the situation, so it is better to play things safe, in my opinion. Also, there's a thread open at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard about this dispute, and it would be great if you could give your interpretation of events over there. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 01:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Yae4 (talk) 01:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Yae4 (talk) 02:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at CopperheadOS shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Today's examples. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Apology for SPI
I apologize for accusing Anupritaisno1, Autobotsrepair and Pitchcurve of being Sockpuppets of Strcat. I note the determination said, "The active accounts are Unrelated. No comment on Strcat, which appears to have been abandoned." Meaning Hmm. -- Yae4 (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)