User talk:Pitcher10

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Plastiscines, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Plastiscines was changed by Pitcher10 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-17T21:59:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TeaDrinker (talk) 08:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Reviews are very rarely added to articles; if there are reviews, they are usually high profile professional reviews. You can well imagine for any movie, band, book, etc. there are literally thousands of possible reviews. Wikipedia can not, nor should it try to, link to all the reviews on a subject. Also, it is evident you have a personal connection to the site you're linking, which makes it inappropriate to link to it. Adding such links are often considered spam, or using Wikipedia for promotion of a particular site (something which is a problem). It is sometimes confusing, since (despite our best efforts) links to blogs, etc. do make it in, which makes other users believe it is acceptable to add their links too. It is not, but keeping it that way is an ongoing challenge. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)