User talk:Pithcrystal

Proposed deletion of Mind the Kitty


The article Mind the Kitty has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Factually incorrect article. "Mind the Kitty" does not appear ever to have been made into a series, but rather was a single episode of Frederator Studios' Random! Cartoons series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm Ring2011. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Random! Cartoons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mind the Kitty does not exist. Ring2011 (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy
Hi. I wanted to talk to you about your recent edits to Ed, Edd n Eddy. Generally, when making substantial changes to an article, it's a good idea to provide an edit summary or to leave a longer explanation on the Talk Page. I see that you are a newly registered user, so don't worry about not knowing this. Wikipedia has a lot of rules and guidelines, and you'll learn them as you go. Unfortunately though, Khanassassin and I had to revert your edits as there were some problems with them.

Where were you getting your information that Danny Antonucci contacted Nickelodeon before Cartoon Network? To my knowledge, the DVD interviews that are being used to source this section of the article do not specify in which order he went to the studios. When adding any information to an article, you are expected to verify it with a reliable reference. If you don't have one and were simply making an assumption, then that would be considered Original Research and isn't allowed. This is a common mistake made by new editors, so again, don't worry. I appreciate your interest in helping out with the article and welcome you to continue editing it.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! :) --Jpcase (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * What if the Disney Channel and Family Channel were described as an influence to moving Ed, Edd n Eddy to Boomerang? I didn't add original research — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pithcrystal (talk • contribs) 01:01, June 14, 2013


 * Could you clarify how the Disney Channel and the Family Channel influenced the decision to move Ed, Edd n Eddy to Boomerang? I'm going to need a little more detail in order to understand this. Simply saying that one thing influenced another though, isn't the same as citing a reference. This page - Citing Sources - explains how to add references to Wikipedia; you should give it a look, but I'd willing to answer any specific questions that you might have. The main point is that we need to know exactly where you first came across any information that you want to add.


 * P.S. You should always make sure to sign your comments. I took care of it for you this time, but all you have to do is add four tildes (~) to the end of your post or click on the pen image at the top of the edit box. I've also taken care of the indentation for you, which is determined by the number of colons you add to the beginning of the post. --Jpcase (talk) 16:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Kenneth Far-Fetched. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ''Note: Google search of this title pulls up only 10 hits, and they are all Wikipedia pages. Highly unlikely that there is no coverage with the cast listed.''--Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Are you serious? Pithcrystal (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Boneheads. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 18:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Now I'll never be able to create hoaxes... :=( Pithcrystal (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

YOU!
YOU 'DARE' NOT WANT TO UNBLOCK ME!? You'll be sad if I kill you... YOU WILL PAY! PREPARE TO FIGHT!

Pithcrystal (talk) 21:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

p.s. you shall see my Power soon! Until then, it is ON!!!!!! >:(