User talk:Pixaranimator

Image copyright problem with File:Nocturna-Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nocturna-Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to DreamWorks Animation, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. If you could, please provide a reliable source for information that this work is being adapted into a film. McDoobAU93 (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmdteK1hJlM&feature=player_embedded

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey thanks, I didnt know how to do that before. But now I will use that feature. --Pixaranimator (talk) 01:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Greetings ... I swear I'm not trying to be a killjoy, but we must focus on the fact that Wikipedia is meant as a source for facts, not for rumors. I truly believe you're working in good faith, but at the same time we can't add rumors or wishlists into the articles, nor should we discuss them on talk pages. I did the same thing when I first started editing, so I understand that you like the subject and want to share what you know. If you'd like to discuss this, reply here or on my talk page. This isn't a warning or anything ... consider it some constructive advice from one editor to another. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

ah ok, just wishful thinking i guess :(. me and my other galfriends always like to see what new disney movies are coming out so you can call me a disney fan girl. sorry about that. --Pixaranimator (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * There's nothing wrong with being a fan ... in fact, it's a pretty good qualification to be working on this project, because it means you care about the subject. And you want to share what you know about it; again, another admirable quality. We just have to be careful about what we add. For what it's worth, everything you have added may well be right--in time. For now, however, we have to work with what has been reported in verifiable sources, and unfortunately the vast majority of blogs don't meet that standard. The rare exception is when the blog cites a published source of its own ... then it could be used, but it'd be better to bypass the middle man (i.e., the blog) and cite the source itself. I think you have a lot to offer, and hope you will continue to contribute to the project. Feel free to contact me anytime with any questions or comments, and thanks! :) --McDoobAU93 (talk) 16:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

King of the Elves
Hey there ... wanted to let you know that I had moved your comment up to the earlier heading of the same name, to avoid redundancy. In order to discuss the subject further, do you have a source for your statement that Elves has been canceled? --McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)