User talk:Pixie2000


 * }

link to British
Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out British or British. Regards, Jeff3000 00:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for joining the Cheshire WikiProject
Just a quick note to thank you for joining the Cheshire WikiProject. I hope we can all make the project become a good one, producing high quality articles which reach Featured Article status. Please feel free to help out if you are able to and want to. DDStretch   (talk)  17:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits to Hartford, Cheshire
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * I am unclear why I spammed the page. I added an economics section to Hartford, Cheshire and cited the local companies by adding links to their pages to show that they really did have registered offices in Hartford, that is all.  I have only been editing wikipedia for a few months but have many hundreds of edits, so I do not consider myself to be a new user.  Please could it be clarified for me what I have done wrong - is it the citations that reference the corporate websites that have been picked up? Pixie2000 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * My apologies for posting a welcome message, I should've posted spam1, but that out of the way... I was unsure about it myself in the first place, I consulted an administrator who said I should revert it and post either welcomespam, or spam1. The sites you linked to were not notable, they were placed under economics, however you previously linked to external cites rather than another Wikipedia article. However I've noticed you've readded the links but linking to the articles about the respective companies. I am pleased with the readdition you have made to the article and apologize for my lack of clarity. ScorpO 00:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes it was because of the citations rather than linking to another article. It looked to me like a form of advertising, now it does not. ScorpO 00:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Maps for Vale Royal and Northwich
Well done! I have been drawing up maps for the districts of Cheshire as well, but you beat me to it in a very nice example for Vale Royal and Northwich. They are exactly in the same style as I have been planning doing as well. Are you planning to complete the other civil parishes of Vale Royal (as was discussed in WP:Cheshire talk pages)? If so, I can concentrate on some of the other districts myself. I was planning to do Congleton and Crewe and Nantwich Boroughs first. I'm at the point of scanning the drawings in and touching up the final edits before uploading them, but I've had to spend time on family matters this week, and so have been a little delayed. City of Chester needs some sorting out as the area is very big, some of the parishes very small at the moment, and I'm not sure whether some amalgamation of parishes there has already happened. All this makes its map a bit tricky to finish off. DDStretch   (talk)  23:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I am glad you like them! I will do the other civic parishes for Vale Royal too - it is quite simple once I have one done to get the others done - it is just a matter of findng the time. I have not really looked at City of Chester, as I do not know that part of Cheshire well at all, but I can imagine it is quite a tricky area to "decypher".  Thanks again!! Pixie2000 21:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Round Tower Lodge, Sandiway
I was about to start a new article on this structure when I discovered you had written a stub. As it happens an article on recent research on the tower was published in the last volume of Cheshire History (2006-7) and I have expanded the stub to incorporate some of this. I have also removed the stubs because I think it now is big enough to constitute an article. Cheshire History is the academic journal of the Cheshire Local History Association and if you would be interested in obtaining a copy I think the Cheshire Record Office could help. Hope you are happy with my development of your work. Peter I. Vardy 15:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks great - well done!! More than happy with what you have written. Pixie2000 09:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Davenham
Wow, I am so happy on your work! Well done.--Vindicta 23:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Chester Zoo
Great work on Chester Zoo, it's looking a lot better. It's on my to-do list as well.  Majorly  (o rly?) 22:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cransley school.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Cransley school.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cransley school.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Cransley school.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cheshire fire service crest.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cheshire fire service crest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Namespace vio
I have moved Pixie2000/Sandbox1 to User:Pixie2000/Sandbox1. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Princes Dock
Thanks very much for adding to Princes Dock with references. Hope you don't mind, but I've adjusted the formatting slightly for the references to be consistent with the existing accessdate format on the page. I'm currently working my way up the Liverpool dock system articles to expand, add refs and standardise structure/formatting. It's a bit of a mammoth task, but is long overdue. (From a fellow 'pedant for consistency') Snowy 1973 (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good work in creating a Port of Liverpool docks template too! Snowy 1973 (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Caravan Club Sites
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Caravan Club Sites, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Thanks for the infoboxes you have added today, particularly (so far as I am concerned) Runcorn Railway Bridge and Dutton Viaduct. They certainly enhance the articles. Keep up the good work! Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Questionnaire
In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.


 * 1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?
 * Answer:


 * 2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?
 * Answer:


 * 3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?
 * Answer:


 * 4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?
 * Answer:


 * 4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?
 * Answer:


 * 5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)
 * Answer:


 * 6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?
 * Answer:


 * 7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?
 * Answer:


 * 8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?
 * Answer:

Northwich
Hi, I remember that ages ago you mentioned that you wanted to get Northwich to GA. It ran into the doldrums, but recently I looked at the article again and I think with a bit of work it could have a decent chance at WP:GAN. I would be happy to expand the demography and economy sections myself, but I think it needs someone who has access to the books used and is more familiar with the article. I don't know how often you check this page given that you haven't edited for a while, but I think with your help the article could gain recognition. Nev1 (talk) 22:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Dock Road Edwardian Pumping Station
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dock Road Edwardian Pumping Station, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.weblo.com/property/city/Northwich/90750. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Marbury Hall, Anderton with Marbury
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pixie2000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) David Thompson (writer) -

Marbury Hall, Anderton with Marbury
Saw your question on the Salvin talk page. Albeit a year late. Jill Allibone: Anthony Salvin, Pioneer of Gothic Revival Architecture is quite clear on Salvin's involvement. Pages 92-3 state "At Marbury Hall Salvin undertook an even greater transformation. Salvin turned the house into a chateau, and the model for this is plainly the style of the Second Empire..." Published by Lutterworth's 1988. Hope this helps. KJP1 (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chester-zoo-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Chester-zoo-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. – ∃   Aditya   7   ¦  13:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of David H. Thompson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David H. Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David H. Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Cheshire portal
Good to hear from you and glad you are still active! I may have bitten your hand off just a little on the Cheshire talk page, sorry! Anything you can do to help would be genuinely appreciated, even if it's just cheering from the sidelines. As I recall, you used to specialise in what's now Cheshire West & Chester, didn't you? Suggestions from there doubly welcome, as I don't know much of that area at all, and now I'm in Scotland, can't just take the car/camera out to find out! Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 12:38, 5 May 2019 (UTC)