User talk:PiyushGrover

You added a number of cites to the Clairvolex article, none of which mention the company, so I have removed them. Can you provide any other references to demonstrate that this company meets the WP:NOTABILITY criteria? -- The Anome (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clairvolex


A tag has been placed on Clairvolex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  12:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Clairvolex has been reverted. Your edit here to Clairvolex was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://intellogist.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/indian-patent-search-alternatives/, http://intellogist.wordpress.com/2011/11/16/pros-and-cons-cipis-search-for-indian-patents-designs-and-trademarks/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

AfC declined
Your article at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clairvolex has been speedy-deleted for the same reasons as the several speedy deletions of essentially the same material that have occured at Clairvolex. If you want to create an article about this company, you must be able to provide evidence in the article that its content meets the WP:NOTABILITY criterion, using reliable sources to back that assertion up. Providing links to pages from reliable sources that do not mention the subject of the article does not achieve that goal: please do not do that again. -- The Anome (talk) 11:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)