User talk:Piyush Pranami

Speedy deletion nomination of Piyush Pranami


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Piyush Pranami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheMesquito buzz  16:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

UTRS 38627 decline
 has been declined. User is banned from UTRS for six months.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here " . Thank you for your attention to these matters.

As you have repeatedly inadequately addressed the reasons for your block, you are now ineligible for consideration at UTRS until six months from now. Please do not evade your block or use sock puppets. You are encouraged to edit other Wikipedias for six months to prove you can edit constructively. After at least six months of constructive, collegial editing on other Wikipedias have passed, you may again request unblocking. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)