User talk:Piznajko

Archive: My archived talk page content is located at User talk:Piznajko/Archive 1

Introduction
Hi, thank you for visiting my talk page. Due recent negativity pushed on me by pro-Russian editors, I'd like to keep this talk page to official messages only; to make myself more clear: unless you're a WP admin or bureaucrat, who came to my TP to leave an official WP message, your contribution to this talk page is not welcome (and will be removed). Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piznajko (talk • contribs) 17:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You got two warnings on discretionary sanctions. I told you last time that the next time you would be blocked. Yesterday, you were clearly told that your activity at Talk:Kiev/Naming is disruptive. You preferred not to listen and went to hound an uninvolved user who closed the discussion . The following blocks will be longer.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request
Request reason:

Decision: ''Neither Decliner nor Accepted. None of the admins were willing to review the case before 2-day block expired ''
 * Appeal moot, block has expired. MER-C 09:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * something is broke in the above template - it looks all wonky. Could you please assist? Thanks!--Piznajko (talk) 09:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Unblock request template was intentionally neutralized because your block has expired.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:41, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I deliberately broke it. The unblock template gives me only "accept" (unblock) or "decline" (stay blocked) options. The outcome is neither of those - I have not made any decision on the merits of your block because I did not need to. P.S. long appeals don't get read. MER-C 09:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks for the clarification . By "long appeals" I assume it's meant appeals that are still not reviewed by the time the block expired, so the appeal becomes simply unresolved. Is that a correct assumption?--Piznajko (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Long as in length of prose. MER-C 10:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement request
Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, as I promised earlier--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian-speaking people by occupation


A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian-speaking people by occupation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)