User talk:Pizzadude54

Removing sourced terms
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Gaming the system to become autoconfirmed so you can edit-war on a semi-protected article is not a sound strategy. Further edits of the same nature will result in your account being blocked per WP:NOTHERE. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

About vandalism
Hi there! Please exercise some care when labeling edits as vandalism. Quoting from WP:VANDALISM: “ Mislabeling good-faith edits "vandalism" can be harmful, as it makes users less likely to respond to corrective advice or to engage collaboratively during a disagreement. For that reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia”. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Final warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)