User talk:Pizzaparty02

Welcome!
  Hello, Pizzaparty02!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Luton
I reverted your edit [which was not "minor", by the way] because it reads as political statement. You wrote As the welcome pack above explains, you are encouraged to WP:Be bold – but the counterpart to that policy is WP:Bold, revert, discuss which says that bold edits may be reverted by other editors. When that happens, the proposer must use the article talk page to make a case that the addition or change merits inclusion: is it properly sourced? is it wp:DUE? is it expressed in neutral terms? is it encyclopedic?
 * Luton is described as a miniature version of Britain's immigration story post-war. but it uncited. Described by whom?
 * since 9/11, that population has been under scrutiny. Says who? scrutiny by whom?
 * Another contributing factor to the scrutiny Says who? what scrutiny?

So if you still feel that your contribution should be included, then please start a new section at talk:Luton. It would be advisable to show how balancing material about Tommy Robinson (aka Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon), the BNP, EDL would be included. And above all, show how the activities of two tiny sets of nutters is representative of the town. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)