User talk:Pjack0128

Speedy deletion of Denticon
A tag has been placed on Denticon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pollytyred (talk) 01:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Pollytyred (talk) 01:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

warning
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. , '''you have now inserting the advertising for this dental software four times, and it has been removed four times. Do not do so again. If you can show' that is actually important, write a brief description, give references to some published articles discussing it in third party reliable sources, not blogs,  put it on your talk page, and ask for permission to add it at WP:Deletion Review.  DGG''' (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)