User talk:PjayB

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gilbert and Sullivan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gilbert and Sullivan was changed by PjayB (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892253 on 2014-06-20T08:15:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Robert Lyn Nelson
Your blatantly promotional and unsourced edit to this article has been reverted. Please read the guidelines and policies in the notice below if you have any connection whatsoever to the subject of this article and follow them scrupulously.

Hello, PjayB. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 12:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

I donʻt know who you are or what your knowledge is about me, but I have been an art reviewer on Maui for nearly two decades. What I wrote are facts regarding Mr. Nelsonʻs background and my professional, expert analysis of his early work. Your unfounded and outrageous accusation that this is promotional and the article unsourced is completely without merit. I have no conflict of interest whatsoever. I am not and have never received any form of compensation either directly nor indirectly from Mr. Nelson. PjayB (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * PjayB, I'm glad to hear that you have no connection to the artist, but unfortunately what you have written reads as if it were written by someone with a conflict of interest. It is very promotional and unencyclopedic in tone, albeit unintentionally. The problem is that this article was created and previously edited by paid editors and has already required extensive clean up. Since you are new here, I suggest you read some of our core policies and guidelines on neutral point of view, no original research, and the type of sourcing that is required for biographies of living people to avoid these kinds of problems. You can also check out Wikipedia's Teahouse. It provides support for new editors where they can ask questions (no question is too basic) and get helpful answers and advice from experienced editors. Voceditenore (talk) 15:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)