User talk:Pjcarpmael

March 2011
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--John (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --John (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Dear John, I am a complete novice in making contributions to Wikipedia, but am keen to do so. My repeated efforts to direct attention to a web-site I have recently set up is not for the purposes of gain or self-advertisement, but in the interests of new historical research. My specific interest is in what I suspect to be a completely new theory concerning the design and original purpose of Norwich Cathedral. It regards the very precise alignment of the Cathedral with a chapel also constructed by the founder, Bishop Herbert Losinga, as well as with several sites which lie in a dead-straight line stretching from East to West across the United Kingdom. My belief is that this was achieved in the interests of the coming Apocalypse, expected to coincide with the entry of the First Crusade into Jerusalem. This is, as I say, entirely new as an idea - or perhaps newly rediscovered. My efforts to link this in to the Wikipedia pages on Norwich Cathedral and on Herbert Losinga (as well as under "Ley-Lines") were perhaps clumsy but not ill-intentioned. I thought (perhaps mistakenly) that the best way of communicating this new way of looking at the historical evidence was by offering a link to my web-site, where the whole theory is very carefully laid out: losinga.com If I were instead to produce an internal Wikipedia page devoted to the theory, would I then be able to make internal links to that? Is there a complete bar on even mentioning relevant web-sites? All the best - Patrick


 * Wikipedia doesn't exist to publish and publicize new theories that haven't yet appeared in any non-self published sources. Before editing it's generally best to familiarize yourself with the policies of Wikipedia, which you can find under the "Help" option on the menu under the interaction heading. I've also left you the standard welcome message, which I strongly suggest you read all of the links for. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome links
Welcome!

Hello, Pjcarpmael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style