User talk:Pjennings424

Hey Pete.

Hey

Regarding IS-6
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as IS-6, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/5pansar/5sidor/js6.htm. As a copyright violation, IS-6 appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. IS-6 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:IS-6. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at IS-6, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

File copyright problem with File:Amblersubs112.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Amblersubs112.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Liacourus_Center.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Liacourus_Center.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Amblersubs112.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Amblersubs112.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.landscapeonline.com/research/article/13630. As a copyright violation, File:Amblersubs112.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Amblersubs112.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Amblersubs112.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Amblersubs112.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Amblersubs112.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GrapedApe (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Temple University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ''' Gfoley4 &#124; Need to chat? My track record ''' 01:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Temple University...i recommend slowing down
While you technically don't have to, you may want to slow down on your edits to Temple University. A number of the edits you made are questionable, and I'm going to change a few of them. My main concern is that you're adding to much flowery speech praising the university, while WP:NPOV requires that all Wikipedia articles have a completely neutral tone. The reason I recommend slowing down is that when you make so many changes in a row, sometimes editors, when they want/need to fix something in the middle, may revert everything you've done. Thus, you end up losing a lot of work simply because some of it wasn't compliant with policy in the middle. I think I can tease out the individual problems myself, but it's always a risk when you make so many dramatic changes in such a short period of time. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dancing statue.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dancing statue.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Bell tower.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bell tower.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)