User talk:Pjetter

__NOINDEX__

Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay ·  Talk 11:50, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Hi LondenP
Because of the block on Wiki-NL, here my comment; I'm not laughing my ass off, as you suggested on the dutch wikipage. On the contrary, I didn't intend a whole blocking and anti-blocking procedure? In fact I didn't even mention your name, nor .Koens in my story. I oppose the abuse of power of moderators and others and have the right to do so. It's not me who kept the dutch Wikipedia one month free of geological articles, that was Siebrand. But I know I'll never persuade you. You and your power-loving mates try to build a fortress on the "ouwe-jongens-krentenbrood"group on Wiki-NL, supporting eachother and gossiping over obscure channels as IRC. Be so honest to say so, be the JeroenVrp or Troefkaart who want certain people excluded from "their" community. It's a bit strange however, that those two supply blocks to others who use phrases like "get off my page". Cheers, mate! Torero 22:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ik kon geen andere reden bedenken waarom je eerste edit meteen weer zo beledigend was; dus dan heb ik verkeerd gedacht. Torero, ik vind jouw discussietechniek slecht, maar ik zag je altijd wel als een intelligent iemand, daarom begrijp ik gewoon niet dat je op dezelfde voet doorgaat. Jouw discussie-aard zorgt ervoor dat mensen afscheid nemen van wikipedia, die de atmosfeer niet bevalt, daarnaast zijn er heel wat mensen die minder gemotiveerd zijn en dus minder edits hebben. Als je je nou eens zou veranderen en niet zo beledigend bent, zou je een waardevolle medewerker zijn (en gewaardeerd ook door mij). Echter ik denk dat die hoop zinloos is. Londenp 13:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Just for the record: you are the only one causing yourself to be banned. No one else. See my comment on your nl.wp talk page. Stick to creating an encyclopedia and stop insulting other users to be enabled to do what you say you would like to do. Siebrand 20:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Significant figures
In most English-language countries, a comma is a thousands separator, not a decimal point. So "12,300" is twelve thousand three hundred, and rounding to two significant figures is "12,000" not "12". --Calair 12:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely right, I apologize. Another "problem" though is that with 12,300 (English) you can have 3, 4 or 5 or even more siginificant figures.Londenp 19:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Seguir el pulso
Dear Sir Dimtri Nikolaj, and Estimated mr. Londenp: I herewith like to really thank you for your helpfull support in the case of my recent astonishing blocking up from further editing again. In the mean time with best regards I remain faithfully yours: D.A. Borgdorff - e.i. MASc. by 86.83.155.44 (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Guido den Broeder
A discussion of Guido den Broeder's conduct and status as an editor has begun at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ANI#Improper_use_of_MfD_page.3F

I've alerted you since you are on his "respected user" list WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 02:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)