User talk:Pjlancer

Welcome!
Hello, Pjlancer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 3 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Mike Murdock page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=747712459 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F747712459%7CMike Murdock%5D%5D Ask for help])

November 2016
Hello, I'm Skyllfully. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mike Murdock without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You may have explained in some revisions but please try and put in sources where it's dubious and try making it more neutral if it's biased. &mdash;Skyllfully (talk &#124; contribs) 03:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I do not see where the article was originally correctly sourced a lot of the sources are opinion blogs and opinion newspaper articles placed online by the trinity foundation. A blog in my opinion is not a accurate source of information. I would like to clean the article up for bias. I do not see where my edits were unreasonable if you could help me in this it would be appreciated